Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in cerebrovascular accident patients: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 31876757
- PMCID: PMC6946413
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018561
Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in cerebrovascular accident patients: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation approach, might be a promising technique in the management of aphasia after cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). This protocol of systematic review (SR) aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of rTMS in patients with aphasia after CVA.
Methods: The following databases will be searched: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge infrastructure (CNKI), Technology Periodical Database (VIP), WanFang Data, and China Biology Medicine (CBM) from inception to August 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness and safety of rTMS for aphasia patients after CVA will be included. Primary outcome will include Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE). Secondary outcomes will include Aphasia Battery of Chinese (ABC), Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT), Aphasia Quotient (AQ), the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB), Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA), Aphasia Severity Rating Scale (ASRS), Concise China Aphasia Test Scale (CCAT), Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (ANELT), or other related outcomes. Adverse events such as headache, tinnitus, anxiety, fatigue, or epileptic seizure will be considered as safety measurement. Studies screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment will be performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis will be conducted with Review Manager 5.3 software and R software 3.6.1.
Results: This study will provide a high-quality synthesis of RCTs on the effectiveness and safety of rTMS as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of aphasia.
Conclusion: The conclusion of this study will help clinicians and patients with aphasia after CVA to make decision.
Ethics and dissemination: No privacy health information will be collected, thus formal ethics approval is not required. The findings of this SR will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.
Prospero registration number: CRD42019144587.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of mirror therapy for post-stroke aphasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.PLoS One. 2024 May 8;19(5):e0301468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301468. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38718090 Free PMC article.
-
Theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction in patients with stroke: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(46):e17929. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017929. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31725646 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on memory disorder in stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 7;101(40):e30933. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030933. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022. PMID: 36221389 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Rehabil. 2021 Aug;35(8):1103-1116. doi: 10.1177/0269215521999554. Epub 2021 Mar 11. Clin Rehabil. 2021. PMID: 33706572
-
A literature review and meta-analysis of the optimal factors study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-infarction aphasia.Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 3;29(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01525-5. Eur J Med Res. 2024. PMID: 38173039 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Enhancing Brain Plasticity to Promote Stroke Recovery.Front Neurol. 2020 Oct 30;11:554089. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.554089. eCollection 2020. Front Neurol. 2020. PMID: 33192987 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Analysis of Prognostic Risk Factors Determining Poor Functional Recovery After Comprehensive Rehabilitation Including Motor-Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Training in Stroke Patients: A Prospective Study.Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 10;12:661816. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.661816. eCollection 2021. Front Neurol. 2021. PMID: 34177767 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of transcranial electrical stimulation on serum neurotrophic factors and language function in patients with speech disorders.World J Clin Cases. 2024 Apr 6;12(10):1742-1749. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i10.1742. World J Clin Cases. 2024. PMID: 38660085 Free PMC article.
-
Study on the Effect of Self-Made Lifei Dingchuan Decoction Combined with Western Medicine on Cough Variant Asthma.Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Sep 12;2022:9803552. doi: 10.1155/2022/9803552. eCollection 2022. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022. Retraction in: Comput Math Methods Med. 2023 Aug 2;2023:9805943. doi: 10.1155/2023/9805943. PMID: 36132547 Free PMC article. Retracted.
-
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Graph Naming Function and Brain Connectivity in Postinfarction Aphasia Patients: An fMRI Study.Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2024;76(3):264-272. doi: 10.1159/000534188. Epub 2023 Oct 3. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2024. PMID: 37788662 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Worrall L, Foster A. Does intensity matter in aphasia rehabilitation? Lancet 2017;389:1494–5. - PubMed
-
- Wang J, Li J, Zhang Y, et al. Effects of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on non-fluent aphasia after stroke. Chin J Rehabil Med 2018;33:1463–4.
-
- Simmons-Mackie N, Worrall L, Murray LL, et al. The top ten: best practice recommendations for aphasia. Aphasiology 2017;31:131–51.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous