Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 5;6(12):ofz517.
doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz517. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Telemedicine Infectious Diseases Consultations and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Telemedicine Infectious Diseases Consultations and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Jason P Burnham et al. Open Forum Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine use is increasing in many specialties, but its impact on clinical outcomes in infectious diseases has not been systematically reviewed. We reviewed the current evidence for clinical effectiveness of telemedicine infectious diseases consultations, including outcomes of mortality, hospital readmission, antimicrobial use, cost, length of stay, adherence, and patient satisfaction.

Methods: We queried Ovid MEDLINE 1946-, Embase.com 1947-, Scopus 1823-, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov 1997- through August 5, 2019, for studies looking at clinical outcomes of infectious diseases in the setting of telemedicine use. We did not restrict by language or year of publication. Clinical outcomes searched included 30-day all-cause mortality, 30-day readmissions, patient compliance/adherence, patient satisfaction, cost or cost-effectiveness, length of hospital stay, antimicrobial use, and antimicrobial stewardship. Bias was assessed using standard methodologies. PROSPERO CRD42018105225.

Results: From a search pool of 1154 studies, only 18 involved telemedicine infectious diseases consultation and our selected clinical outcomes. The outcomes tracked were heterogeneous, precluding meta-analysis, and the majority of studies were of poor quality. Overall, clinical outcomes with telemedicine infectious diseases consultation seem comparable to in-person infectious diseases consultation.

Conclusions: Although in widespread use, the clinical effectiveness of telemedicine infectious diseases consultations has yet to be sufficiently studied. Further studies, or publication of previously collected and available data, are warranted to verify the cost-effectiveness of this widespread practice.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018105225.

Keywords: clinical outcomes; infectious diseases consultation; mortality; systematic review; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart for systematic review.

References

    1. Burnham JP, Olsen MA, Kollef MH. Re-estimating annual deaths due to multidrug-resistant organism infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019; 40(1):112–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McQuillen DP, MacIntyre AT. The value that infectious diseases physicians bring to the healthcare system. J Infect Dis 2017; 216:588–93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vogel M, Schmitz RP, Hagel S, et al. . Infectious disease consultation for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia - a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect 2016; 72:19–28. - PubMed
    1. Burnham JP, Olsen MA, Stwalley D, et al. . Infectious diseases consultation reduces 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality for multidrug-resistant organism infections. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018; 5(X):XXX–XX. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chandrasekar PH. Bad news to worse news: 2015 infectious diseases fellowship match results. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60:1438. - PubMed