Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 15;41(6):472-476.

Models to Predict Future Permanent Tooth Caries Incidence in Children Using Primary Teeth Caries Experience

Affiliations

Models to Predict Future Permanent Tooth Caries Incidence in Children Using Primary Teeth Caries Experience

Tariq S Ghazal et al. Pediatr Dent. .

Abstract

Purpose: To assess permanent tooth caries incidence (ΔDMFS) among a cohort of African American children using the presence of any caries experience(decayed, missing, and filled surfaces-dmfs) in primary teeth and the presence of untreated primary tooth caries (ds) in two separate models. Methods: Data from a prospective study was used to apply two models with different clinical for predicting DMFS from ages six through 12 years. The first model used dmfs, and the second model used ds as predictors (both at age six years). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed. Results: The first model resulted in sensitivity from 81.8 percent to 100 percent, specificity from 35.6 percent to 42.6, PPV from 5.8 percent to 38.1 percent, and NPV from 90.0 percent to 100 percent. In the second model, the predictive values were from 33.3 percent to 55.6 percent, 62.7 percent to 72.7 percent, 3.4 percent to 45.5 percent, and 80 percent to 95.9 percent, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed models for permanent tooth caries incidence prediction are easy, not time consuming, and clinically applicable; if validated, they have the potential to change the current paradigm for caries risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Messer LB. Assessing caries risk in children. Aust Dent J. 2000; 45(1):10–6. - PubMed
    1. Vanobbergen J, Martens L, Lesaffre E, Bogaerts K, Declerck D. The value of a baseline caries risk assessment model in the primary dentition for the prediction of caries incidence in the permanent dentition. Caries Res. 2001; 35(6):442–50. - PubMed
    1. Fleming E, Afful J. Prevalence of total and untreated dental caries among youth: United States, 2015–2016 NCHS Data Brief, no 307. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2018 - PubMed
    1. Chaffee BW, Featherstone JD, Gansky SA, Cheng J, Zhan L. Caries Risk Assessment Item Importance: Risk Designation and Caries Status in Children under Age 6. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2016;1(2):131–142. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Featherstone JD, Domejean-Orliaguet S, Jenson L, Wolff M, Young DA. Caries risk assessment in practice for age 6 through adult. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007;35(10):703–7. - PubMed