Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):19942.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56519-3.

Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography for the exclusion of coronary artery disease in candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Affiliations

Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography for the exclusion of coronary artery disease in candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Christopher Strong et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Coronary CT angiography (CTA) is currently considered a reliable method to exclude obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) before valvular heart surgery in patients with low pretest probability. However, its role in excluding obstructive CAD before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is less well established. Single-center retrospective study where patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis underwent both CTA and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as part of TAVI planning. CTA exams were conducted on a 64-slice dual source scanner, with a median interval of 45 days to ICA (IQR 25-75 [13-82]). In both tests, obstructive CAD was defined as a ≥50% stenosis in an epicardial vessel ≥2 mm diameter. Per-patient, per-vessel and per-proximal segment analyses were conducted, excluding and including non-evaluable segments. The study included 200 patients (120 women, mean age 83 ± 6 years). The prevalence of obstructive CAD on ICA was 35.5% (n = 71). On a per-patient analysis (assuming non-evaluable segments as stenotic), CTA showed sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 95-100%), specificity of 42% (95% CI, 33-51%), and positive and negative predictive values of 48% (95% CI, 44-51%) and 100% (95% CI, 92-100%), respectively. CTA was able to exclude obstructive CAD in 54 patients (27%), in whom ICA could have been safely withheld. Despite the high rate of inconclusive tests, pre-procedural CTA is able to safely exclude obstructive CAD in a significant proportion of patients undergoing TAVI, possibly avoiding the need for ICA in roughly one quarter of the cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient selection flowchart. ACS - acute coronary syndrome; AS - aortic stenosis; CAD - coronary artery disease; CTA - computed tomography angiography; ICA - invasive coronary angiography.

References

    1. Abdel-Wahab M, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with and without concomitant coronary artery disease: comparison of characteristics and early outcome in the German multicenter TAVI registry. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012;101(12):973–81. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0486-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stefanini G, et al. Coronary artery disease severity and aortic stenosis: clinical outcomes according to SYNTAX score in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(37):2530–2540. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu074. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fusini L, et al. Incidence and severity of atherosclerotic cardiovascular artery disease in patients undergoing TAVI. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;31(5):975–85. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0651-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schoenhagen P, Hausleiter J, Achenbach S, Desai M, Tuzcu E. Computed tomography in the evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) Cardiovasc. Diagn Ther. 2011;1(1):44–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andreini D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mutidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in 325 consecutive patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J. 2014;168(3):332–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.04.022. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms