Reassessment of the clinical impact of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA-Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation
- PMID: 31883413
- DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15766
Reassessment of the clinical impact of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA-Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation
Abstract
Anti-denatured HLA-Cw antibodies are highly prevalent, whereas anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies seem to lead to random flow cytometry crossmatch results. We aimed to reassess crossmatch prediction for anti-HLA-Cw using 2 types of single antigen flow beads (classical beads and beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA), and to compare the pathogenicity of preformed anti-denatured and anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation. We performed 135 crossmatches with sera reacting against donor HLA-Cw (classical beads fluorescence ≥500); only 20.6% were positive. Forty-three (31.6%) were anti-denatured HLA antibodies (beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA fluorescence <300); all were crossmatch negative. The correlation between classical beads fluorescence and the crossmatch ratio was low (ρ = 0.178), and slightly higher with beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA (ρ = 0.289). We studied 52 kidney recipients with preformed anti-HLA-Cw donor-specific antibodies. Those with anti-native HLA antibodies experienced more acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejections (P = .006 and .03, respectively), and displayed a lower graft survival (P = .04). Patients with anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies more frequently had previous sensitizing events (P < .000001) or plausibility of their antibody profile according to known anti-native HLA-Cw eplets (P = .0001). Anti-native but not anti-denatured HLA-Cw antibodies are deleterious, which underscores the need for reagents with diminished expression of denatured HLA.
Keywords: alloantibody; basic (laboratory) research/science; clinical research/practice; crossmatch; flow cytometry; histocompatibility; kidney transplantation/nephrology; major histocompatibility complex (MHC); rejection: antibody-mediated (ABMR).
© 2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
Comment in
-
Optimizing the assessment of pathogenic anti-HLA antibodies.Am J Transplant. 2021 Jan;21(1):431-432. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16127. Epub 2020 Jul 7. Am J Transplant. 2021. PMID: 32515088 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Pei R, Lee J-H, Shih N-J, Chen M, Terasaki PI. Single human leukocyte antigen flow cytometry beads for accurate identification of human leukocyte antigen antibody specificities. Transplantation. 2003;75(1):43-49.
-
- El-Awar N, Lee J, Terasaki PI. HLA antibody identification with single antigen beads compared to conventional methods. Hum Immunol. 2005;66(9):989-997.
-
- Lefaucheur C, Loupy A, Hill GS, et al. Preexisting donor-specific HLA antibodies predict outcome in kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(8):1398-1406.
-
- Bray RA, Nolen JDL, Larsen C, et al. Transplanting the highly sensitized patient: the Emory algorithm. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(10):2307-2315.
-
- Cecka JM, Kucheryavaya AY, Reinsmoen NL, Leffell MS. Calculated PRA: initial results show benefits for sensitized patients and a reduction in positive crossmatches. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(4):719-724.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
