Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 29:2019:5629371.
doi: 10.1155/2019/5629371. eCollection 2019.

Comparison of the Effects of Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol and Sevoflurane as Maintenance of Anesthesia on Hemodynamic Profile in Kidney Transplantation

Affiliations

Comparison of the Effects of Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol and Sevoflurane as Maintenance of Anesthesia on Hemodynamic Profile in Kidney Transplantation

Dita Aditianingsih et al. Anesthesiol Res Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Target-controlled infusion (TCI) propofol and sevoflurane are common agents for general anesthesia, including for kidney transplantation procedure. This study compared the effect of TCI propofol and sevoflurane on intraoperative hemodynamic profile in kidney transplant patients.

Methods: A single-blinded prospective study was performed in 46 kidney transplant recipients who were randomized into receiving TCI propofol or sevoflurane as anesthetics maintenance. Hemodynamic parameters such as mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) were measured at baseline before induction, postintubation, first surgical incision, every 15 minutes after the first incision, reperfusion, and 15 minutes after reperfusion. Data were analyzed using unpaired t-test, paired t-test, and general linear model.

Results: Intraoperative MAP, CI, SVI, and SVRI changes were similar in both groups (p = 0.480, 0.216, 0.086, and 0.054). In comparison to the baseline value, TCI propofol and sevoflurane groups showed significant reductions of MAP at postintubation (p=0.010; p < 0.001) and during the first surgical incision (p=0.009; p < 0.001); significant reduction of CI at postintubation (p=0.003; p < 0.001) and during the first surgical incision (p < 0.001; p < 0.001); significant reduction of SVI at postintubation (p=0.013; p=0.008), during the first surgical incision (p=0.008; p=0.003), and 15 minutes after reperfusion (p=0.010; p=0.005); and significant increasing of SVRI during the first surgical incision (p=0.007; p=0.005). The TCI propofol group showed significantly lower SVRI compared to the sevoflurane group postintubation (p=0.029) and during the first surgical incision (p=0.026).

Conclusion: Intraoperative hemodynamic profile was similar between the TCI propofol and sevoflurane group during kidney transplant surgery. The TCI propofol group had higher CI and SVI but showed significantly lower SVRI as compared to the sevoflurane group. The incidence of postanesthesia agitation, postoperative outcome, and complication were not significantly different between the two groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flow diagram of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intraoperative bispectral index value. Time points are as follows: postintubation (T1), first surgical incision (T2), every 15 minutes after the first incision (T3–T12), reperfusion (T13), and 15 minutes after reperfusion (T14).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intraoperative mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, stroke volume index, and systemic vascular resistance index. Time points are as follows: baseline (T0), postintubation (T1), first surgical incision (T2), every 15 minutes after first incision (T3–T12), reperfusion (T13), and 15 minutes after reperfusion (T14). Unpaired t‐test for comparison between groups; † Paired t‐test for comparison with baseline; p < 0.005 is significant.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sarinkapoor H., Kaur R., Kaur H. Anaesthesia for renal transplant surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2007;51(10):1354–1367. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01447.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park J. H., Lee J. H., Joo D. J., Song K. J., Kim Y. S., Koo B.-N. Effect of sevoflurane on grafted kidney function in renal transplantation. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2012;62(6):529–535. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.6.529. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kashkouli A., Moradi A., Torabian S., Amir-Zargar M., Gholyaf M. Comparison of safety and efficacy of general and spinal anesthesia in kidney transplantation: evaluation of the peri-operative outcome. Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation. 2015;26(3):p. 447. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.157300. - DOI - PubMed
    1. KDIGO. Chapter 1: definition and classification of CKD. Kidney International Supplements. 2013;3(1):19–62. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.64. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cingi E., Beebe D. S., Harmon J. V., Jr., Belani K. Anesthesia and Perioperative Care for Organ Transplantation. New York, NY, USA: Springer Nature; 2016. Preoperative recipient evaluation and preparation (kidney) pp. 275–280. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources