Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 30;22(4):199-204.
doi: 10.5770/cgj.22.391. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Self-Rated Health Predicts Mortality in Very Old Men-the Manitoba Follow-Up Study

Affiliations

Self-Rated Health Predicts Mortality in Very Old Men-the Manitoba Follow-Up Study

Christian R Hanson et al. Can Geriatr J. .

Abstract

Background: Self-rated health (SRH) predicts death, but there are few studies over long-time horizons that are able to explore the effect age may have on the relationship between SRH and mortality.

Objectives: 1. To determine how SRH evolves over 20 years; and 2. To determine if SRH predicts death in very old men.

Methods: We analyzed a prospective cohort study of men who were fit for air crew training in the Second World War. In 1996, a regular questionnaire was administered to the 1,779 surviving participants. SRH was elicited with a 5-point Likert Scale with the categories: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor/bad. We examined the age-specific distribution of SRH in these categories from the age of 75 to 95 years, to the end of the follow-up period in 2018. We constructed age-specific Cox proportional hazard models with an outcome of time to death.

Results: SRH declined with age. The gradient in risk of death persisted across all ages; those with poor/fair/bad SRH had consistently higher mortality rates. However, the discrimination between good and excellent was less in those aged 85+.

Conclusions: SRH declines with advancing age, but continues to predict death in older men.

Keywords: cohort study; mortality; self-rated health; subjective health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Categories of SRH over the course of the study
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The Kaplan-Meier plot for survival in categories of self-rated health at the age of 75: 1 is excellent, 2 is very good, 3 is good, and 45 is fair/poor/bad
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The Kaplan-Meier plot for survival in categories of self-rated health at the age of 80: 1 is excellent, 2 is very good, 3 is good, and 45 is fair/poor/bad
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The Kaplan-Meier plot for survival in categories of self-rated health at the age of 85: 1 is excellent, 2 is very good, 3 is good, and 45 is fair/poor/bad
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
The Kaplan-Meier plot for survival in categories of self-rated health at the age of 90: 1 is excellent, 2 is very good, 3 is good, and 45 is fair/poor/bad

References

    1. McDowell I. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. - DOI
    1. Mossey JM, Shapiro E. Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1982;72(8):800–08. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.72.8.800. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behavior. 1997;38(1):21–37. doi: 10.2307/2955359. - DOI - PubMed
    1. DeSalvo KB, Bloser N, Reynolds K, et al. Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question: a meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(3):267–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00291.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirosaki M, Okumiya K, Wada T, et al. Self-rated health is associated with subsequent functional decline among older adults in Japan. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017;29(9):1475–83. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217000692. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources