Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr;19(4):633-645.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.016. Epub 2019 Dec 27.

What Multilevel Interventions Do We Need to Increase the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate to 80%?

Affiliations
Review

What Multilevel Interventions Do We Need to Increase the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate to 80%?

John M Inadomi et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Screening reduces colorectal cancer mortality; however, this remains the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States and adherence to colorectal cancer screening falls far short of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable goal of 80%. Numerous studies have examined the effectiveness of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake. Outreach is the active dissemination of screening outside of the primary care setting, such as mailing fecal blood tests to individuals' homes. Navigation uses trained personnel to assist individuals through the screening process. Patient education may take the form of brochures, videos, or websites. Provider education can include feedback about screening rates of patient panels. Reminders to healthcare providers can be provided by dashboards of patients due for screening. Financial incentives provide monetary compensation to individuals when they complete screening tests, either as fixed payments or via a lottery. Individual preference for specific screening strategies has also been examined in several trials, with a choice of screening strategies yielding higher adherence than recommendation of a single strategy.

Keywords: Colorectal Cancer; Healthcare Disparities; Implementation Science; Mass Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest stated for this work.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Conceptual Model of Multilevel Cancer Screening
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
PROSPR Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Process Model
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
The Health Belief Model

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:7–30. - PubMed
    1. Wender RC, Doroshenk M, Brooks D, et al. Creating and Implementing a National Public Health Campaign: The American Cancer Society’s and National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable’s 80% by 2018 Initiative. Am J Gastroenterol 2018;113:1739–1741. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prevention CfDCa. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Volume 2019, 2019.
    1. Sabatino SA, White MC, Thompson TD, et al. Cancer screening test use - United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015;64:464–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. 80% by 2018. Volume 2016: National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable, 2016.

Publication types