Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):1018.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4848-9.

Patients' perception of communication at the interface between primary and secondary care: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries

Affiliations

Patients' perception of communication at the interface between primary and secondary care: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries

Giacomo Scaioli et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Poor communication between general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists can lead to poorer quality, and continuity, of care. Our study aims to assess patients' perceptions of communication at the interface between primary and secondary care in 34 countries. It will analyse, too, whether this communication is associated with the organisation of primary care within a country, and with the characteristics of GPs and their patients.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among patients in 34 countries. Following a GP consultation, patients were asked two questions. Did they take to understand that their GP had informed medical specialists about their illness upon referral? And, secondly, did their GP know the results of the treatment by a medical specialist? We used multi-response logistic multilevel models to investigate the association of factors related to primary care, the GP, and the patient, with the patients' perceptions of communication at the interface between primary and secondary care.

Results: In total, 61,931 patients completed the questionnaire. We found large differences between countries, in both the patients' perceptions of information shared by GPs with medical specialists, and the patients' perceptions of the GPs' awareness of the results of treatment by medical specialists. Patients whose GPs stated that they 'seldom or never' send referral letters, also less frequently perceived that their GP communicated with their medical specialists about their illness. Patients with GPs indicating they 'seldom or never' receive feedback from medical specialists, indicated less frequently that their GP would know the results of treatment by a medical specialist. Moreover, patients with a personal doctor perceived higher rates of communication in both directions at the interface between primary and secondary care.

Conclusion: Generally, patients perceive there to be high rates of communication at the interface between primary and secondary care, but there are large differences between countries. Policies aimed at stimulating personal doctor arrangements could, potentially, enhance the continuity of care between primary and secondary care.

Keywords: Communication; Patient views; Primary care; Referrals; Secondary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Visual model: features that potentially influence patients’ perspective of communication between GPs and medical specialists
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percentages of patients who agreed, and disagreed, with the statement: “When I am referred, my GP informs the medical specialist about my illness”, by country, numbers between brackets
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percentages of patients who agreed, and disagreed, with the statement: “After treatment by a medical specialist, my GP knows the results”, by country, numbers between brackets

References

    1. European Health for All Database. Available at http://www.euro.who.int/en/data-and-evidence/databases/european-health-f.... Last access: February 2016.
    1. Epstein RM. Communication between primary care physicians and consultants. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4:403–409. doi: 10.1001/archfami.4.5.403. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gandhi TK, Sittig DF, Franklin M, et al. Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:626–631. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91119.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O'Malley AS, Cunningham PJ. Patient experiences with coordination of care: the benefit of continuity and primary care physician as referral source. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:170–177. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0885-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garasen H, Johnsen R. The quality of communication about older patients between hospital physicians and family physicians: a panel study assessment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:133. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-133. - DOI - PMC - PubMed