Subgingival instrumentation for treatment of periodontitis. A systematic review
- PMID: 31889320
- DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13245
Subgingival instrumentation for treatment of periodontitis. A systematic review
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of subgingival instrumentation (PICOS-1), sonic/ultrasonic/hand instruments (PICOS-2) and different subgingival instrumentation delivery protocols (PICOS-3) to treat periodontitis.
Methods: Systematic electronic search (CENTRAL/MEDLINE/EMBASE/SCOPUS/LILACS) to March 2019 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting on subgingival instrumentation. Duplicate screening and data extraction were performed to formulate evidence tables and meta-analysis as appropriate.
Results: As only one RCT addressed the efficacy of subgingival instrumentation compared with supragingival cleaning alone (PICOS-1), baseline and final measures from 9 studies were considered. The weighted pocket depth (PD) reduction was 1.4 mm (95%CI: 1.0 1.7) at 6/8 months, and the proportion of pocket closure was estimated at 74% (95%CI: 64-85). Six RCTs compared hand and sonic/ultrasonic instruments for subgingival instrumentation (PICOS-2). No significant differences were observed between groups by follow-up time point or category of initial PD. Thirteen RCTs evaluated quadrant-wise versus full-mouth approaches (PICOS-3). No significant differences were observed between groups irrespective of time-points or initial PD. Five studies reported patient-reported outcomes, reporting no differences between groups.
Conclusions: Nonsurgical periodontal therapy by mechanical subgingival instrumentation is an efficacious means to achieve infection control in periodontitis patients irrespective of the type of instrument or mode of delivery. Prospero ID: CRD42019124887.
Keywords: nonsurgical treatment; periodontal disease; pocket closure; scaling and root planning; subgingival instrumentation.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Apatzidou, D. A., & Kinane, D. F. (2004). Quadrant root planing versus same-day full-mouth root planing. I. Clinical findings. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 31(2), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0303-6979.2004.00461.x
-
- Badersten, A., Nilveus, R., & Egelberg, J. (1990). Scores of plaque, bleeding, suppuration and probing depth to predict probing attachment loss. 5 years of observation following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 17(2), 102-107.
-
- Borenstein, M., Higgins, J. P. T., Hedges, L. V., & Rothstein, H. R. (2017). Basics of meta-analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1230
-
- Breininger, D. R., O'Leary, T. J., & Blumenshine, R. V. (1987). Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus. Journal of Periodontology, 58(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1987.58.1.9
-
- Claffey, N., & Egelberg, J. (1995). Clinical indicators of probing attachment loss following initial periodontal treatment in advanced periodontitis patients. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 22(9), 690-696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb00828.x
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials