Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Jul:47 Suppl 22:155-175.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13245.

Subgingival instrumentation for treatment of periodontitis. A systematic review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Subgingival instrumentation for treatment of periodontitis. A systematic review

Jeanie Suvan et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of subgingival instrumentation (PICOS-1), sonic/ultrasonic/hand instruments (PICOS-2) and different subgingival instrumentation delivery protocols (PICOS-3) to treat periodontitis.

Methods: Systematic electronic search (CENTRAL/MEDLINE/EMBASE/SCOPUS/LILACS) to March 2019 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting on subgingival instrumentation. Duplicate screening and data extraction were performed to formulate evidence tables and meta-analysis as appropriate.

Results: As only one RCT addressed the efficacy of subgingival instrumentation compared with supragingival cleaning alone (PICOS-1), baseline and final measures from 9 studies were considered. The weighted pocket depth (PD) reduction was 1.4 mm (95%CI: 1.0 1.7) at 6/8 months, and the proportion of pocket closure was estimated at 74% (95%CI: 64-85). Six RCTs compared hand and sonic/ultrasonic instruments for subgingival instrumentation (PICOS-2). No significant differences were observed between groups by follow-up time point or category of initial PD. Thirteen RCTs evaluated quadrant-wise versus full-mouth approaches (PICOS-3). No significant differences were observed between groups irrespective of time-points or initial PD. Five studies reported patient-reported outcomes, reporting no differences between groups.

Conclusions: Nonsurgical periodontal therapy by mechanical subgingival instrumentation is an efficacious means to achieve infection control in periodontitis patients irrespective of the type of instrument or mode of delivery. Prospero ID: CRD42019124887.

Keywords: nonsurgical treatment; periodontal disease; pocket closure; scaling and root planning; subgingival instrumentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Apatzidou, D. A., & Kinane, D. F. (2004). Quadrant root planing versus same-day full-mouth root planing. I. Clinical findings. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 31(2), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0303-6979.2004.00461.x
    1. Badersten, A., Nilveus, R., & Egelberg, J. (1990). Scores of plaque, bleeding, suppuration and probing depth to predict probing attachment loss. 5 years of observation following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 17(2), 102-107.
    1. Borenstein, M., Higgins, J. P. T., Hedges, L. V., & Rothstein, H. R. (2017). Basics of meta-analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1230
    1. Breininger, D. R., O'Leary, T. J., & Blumenshine, R. V. (1987). Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus. Journal of Periodontology, 58(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1987.58.1.9
    1. Claffey, N., & Egelberg, J. (1995). Clinical indicators of probing attachment loss following initial periodontal treatment in advanced periodontitis patients. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 22(9), 690-696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb00828.x

LinkOut - more resources