Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr;29(7-8):1398-1421.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.15171. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

The pressure injury predictive model: A framework for hospital-acquired pressure injuries

Affiliations
Free article
Review

The pressure injury predictive model: A framework for hospital-acquired pressure injuries

Dana Tschannen et al. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Despite decades of research, pressure injuries continue to be a source of significant pain and delayed recovery for patients and substantial quality and cost issues for hospitals. Consideration of the current thinking around pressure injury risk must be evaluated to improve risk assessments and subsequent nursing interventions aimed at reducing hospital-acquired pressure injuries.

Design: This is a discursive paper using Walker and Avant's (2005) theory synthesis framework to examine the relevance of existing pressure injury models as they align with the current literature.

Methods: PubMed and CINAHL indexes were searched, first for conceptual models and then for pressure injury research conducted on hospitalised patients for the years 2006-2016. A synthesis of the searches culminated into a new pressure injury risk model.

Conclusions: Gaps in previous models include lack of attention to the environment, contributing episode-of-care factors and the dynamic nature of injury risk for patients. Through theory synthesis, the need for a new model representing the full risk for pressure injury was identified. The Pressure Injury Predictive Model is a representation of the complex and dynamic nature of pressure injury risk that builds on previous models and addresses new patient, contextual and episode-of-care process influences. The Pressure Injury Predictive Model (PIPM) provides a more accurate picture of the complexity of contextual and process factors associated with pressure injury development.

Relevance to clinical practice: Using the PIPM to determine risk can result in improved risk identification. This information can be used to implement targeted, evidence-based pressure injury prevention interventions specific to the patient risk profile, thus limiting unwarranted and unnecessary care.

Keywords: hospitalisation; nursing theory; predictive model; pressure injury; pressure ulcer; theory synthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. AHRQ. (2018). AHRQ National Scorecard on Hospital-Acquired Conditions: Updated Baseline Rates and Preliminary Results 2014-2016. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved from https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/pfp/index.html
    1. Aljezawi, M., Al Qadire, M., & Tubaishat, A. (2014). Pressure ulcers in long-term care: A point prevalence study in Jordan. British Journal of Nursing, 23(Suppl 6), S4, S6, S8, S10-11. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2014.23.Sup6.S4
    1. Antokal, S., Brienza, D., Bryan, N., Herbe, L., Logan, S., Maguire, J., … Siddiqui, A. (2012). Friction induced skin injuries - Are they pressure ulcers?. A National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel white paper. Retrieved from https://www.npuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/NPUAP-Friction-White-Pa...
    1. AORN Guidelines for Perioperative Practice (2019). Denver, CO, USA: AORN (Association of periOperative Registered Nurses). Retrieved from http://online.statref.com.proxy.lib.umich.edu/Document.aspx?docAddress=m...
    1. Aydin, C., Donaldson, N., Stotts, N. A., Fridman, M., & Brown, D. S. (2015). Modeling hospital-acquired pressure ulcer prevalence on medical-surgical units: Nurse workload, expertise, and clinical processes of care. Health Services Research, 50(2), 351-373. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12244