Influence of time on primary stability of dental implants placed with osteotomes due to the elastic properties of peri-implant bone
- PMID: 31890122
- PMCID: PMC6921116
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.04.004
Influence of time on primary stability of dental implants placed with osteotomes due to the elastic properties of peri-implant bone
Abstract
Background/purpose: The use of osteotomes as a technique for densification and expansion of the residual ridge is one of the most widely used procedures to achieve adequate peri-implant bone quantity and density. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of time and the elastic deformation of peri-implant bone in the primary stability of implants placed using osteotomes.
Materials and methods: In each of 10 fresh fragments of cow rib, two implants were placed using osteotomes. The insertion torque and initial implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were measured. In the control implants, the immediate removal torque was measured, while in the test implants, after 15 min of placement, ISQ values were measured again, and the removal torque was measured.
Results: There were significant differences between the ISQ values and between the insertion torque and removal torque at 15 min. The ISQ values (perpendicular/parallel) increased between the initial moment (64.4 ± 9/70.3 ± 5.9) and 15 min (66/71.4 ± 6.4). The removal torque at 15 min (12.4 ± 5.8) was lower than the insertion torque (15.9 ± 5.9). Compression of the trabeculae in contact with the implant placed using osteotomes was observed, as well as a greater number of trabecular fractures in the implants placed using conventional drilling.
Conclusion: There is an increase in ISQ values of dental implants placed using osteotomes after 15 min of placement.
Keywords: Implant stability; Osteotomes; Resonance frequency analysis.
© 2019 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
Figures









Similar articles
-
Influence of Cortical Layer and Surgical Techniques on the Primary Implant Stability in Low-density Bone: An In Vitro Study.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):146-151. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021. PMID: 34257173
-
Evaluation of local cancellous bone amelioration by poly-L-DL-lactide copolymers to improve primary stability of dental implants: a biomechanical study in sheep.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 May;26(5):572-80. doi: 10.1111/clr.12445. Epub 2014 Jul 2. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015. PMID: 24989873
-
Influence of defect depth on resonance frequency analysis and insertion torque values for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a human cadaver study.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Mar;11(1):52-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00095.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009. PMID: 18384400
-
The Interrelation between Cortical Bone Thickness and Primary and Secondary Dental Implant Stability: a Systematic Review.J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2024 Dec 31;15(4):e2. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2024.15402. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2024. PMID: 40017687 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2023 Oct 11;15(10):e46841. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46841. eCollection 2023 Oct. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37954787 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the primary stability in dental implants placed in low density bone with a new drilling technique, Osseodensification: an in vitro study.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 May 1;26(3):e361-e367. doi: 10.4317/medoral.24231. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021. PMID: 33037795 Free PMC article.
-
Dental Implant with Porous Structure and Anchorage: Design and Bench Testing in a Calf Rib Model Study.Materials (Basel). 2025 Feb 5;18(3):700. doi: 10.3390/ma18030700. Materials (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39942366 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Albrektsson T., Zarb G., Worthington P., Eriksson A.R. The long term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 1986;1:1–25. - PubMed
-
- Sennerby L., Thomsen P., Ericson L.E. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 1992;7:62–71. - PubMed
-
- Lekholm U., Zarb G.A. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark P.I., Zarb G.A., Albrektsson T., editors. Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. 1st ed. Quintessence; Chicago, IL: 1985. pp. 199–209.
-
- Teughels W., Merheb J., Quirynen M. Critical horizontal dimensions of interproximal and buccal bone around implants for optimal aesthetic outcomes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2009;20:134–135. - PubMed
-
- Summers R.B. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium. 1994;15:152–160. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources