Girl Empower - A gender transformative mentoring and cash transfer intervention to promote adolescent wellbeing: Impact findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Liberia
- PMID: 31890847
- PMCID: PMC6928354
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100527
Girl Empower - A gender transformative mentoring and cash transfer intervention to promote adolescent wellbeing: Impact findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Liberia
Abstract
Background: We evaluated Girl Empower - an intervention that aimed to equip adolescent girls with the skills to make healthy, strategic life choices and to stay safe from sexual abuse using a cluster-randomized controlled trial with three arms: control, Girl Empower (GE), and GE+.
Methods: GE delivered a life skills curriculum to girls aged 13-14 in Liberia, facilitated by local female mentors. In the GE + variation, a cash incentive payment was offered to caregivers for girls' participation in the program. We evaluated the impact of the program on seven pre-specified domains using standardized indices: sexual violence, schooling, sexual and reproductive health (SRH), psychosocial wellbeing, gender attitudes, life skills, and protective factors.
Findings: Participation rates in the program were high in both GE and GE+, with the average participant attending 28 out of 32 sessions. At 24 months, the standardized effects of both GE and GE+, compared to control, on sexual violence, schooling, psychosocial wellbeing, and protective factors were small (β, ≤ 0.11 standard deviations [SD]) and not statistically significant at the 95% level of confidence. However, we found positive standardized effects on Gender Attitudes (GE: β, 0.206 SD, p<0.05; GE+: β, 0.228 SD, p<0.05), Life Skills (GE: β, 0.224 SD, p<0.05; GE+: β, 0.289 SD, p<0.01), and SRH (GE: β, 0.244 SD, p<0.01; GE+: β, 0.372 SD, p<0.01; F-test for GE = GE+: p = 0.075).
Interpretation: Girl Empower led to sustained improvements in several important domains, including SRH, but did not reduce sexual violence among the target population.
Keywords: Adolescent welfare; Cash transfers; Mentoring programs; Sexual violence.
© 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Anderson M. Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the abecedarian, perry preschool, and early training projects. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2008;103(484):1481–1495.
-
- Austrian K., Muthengi E. Can economic assets increase girls' risk of sexual harassment? Evaluation results from a social, health and economic asset-building intervention for vulnerable adolescent girls in Uganda. Children and Youth Services Review. 2014;47:168–175.
-
- Baird S.J., Garfein R.S., McIntosh C.T., Ozler B. Effect of a cash transfer programme for schooling on prevalence of HIV and herpes simplex type 2 in Malawi: A cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9823):1320–1329. - PubMed
-
- Baird S., McIntosh C.T., Ozler B. Cash or condition? Evidence from a cash transfer experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2011;126(4):1709–1753.
-
- Baird S., McIntosh C., Özler B. When the money runs out: Do cash transfers have sustained effects on human capital accumulation? Journal of Development Economics. 2019;140:169–185.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources