Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov 13;4(6):678-683.
doi: 10.1002/lio2.329. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response to cochlear implant biomaterials

Megan J Foggia  1 , Rene Vielman Quevedo  1 , Marlan R Hansen  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response to cochlear implant biomaterials

Megan J Foggia et al. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. .

Abstract

Objective: To report current knowledge on the topic of intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response following cochlear implantation (CI).

Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed to identify peer-reviewed articles. Search components included "cochlear implant," "Foreign body response (FBR)," and "fibrosis." Original studies and review articles relevant to the topic were included.

Results: Ninety peer-reviewed articles describing the foreign body response or intracochlear fibrosis following CI were included.

Conclusions: Intracochlear fibrosis following CI represents a significant limiting factor for the success of CI users. Several strategies have been employed to mitigate the foreign body response within the cochlea including drug delivery systems and modifications in surgical technique and electrode design. A better understanding of the FBR has the potential to improve CI outcomes and the next generation of cochlear prostheses.

Keywords: biomaterials; cochlear implant; fibrosis; foreign body response; impedance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Hansen is a co‐founder and Chief Medical Officer of Iotamotion, Inc. All other authors of this work declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A, Schematic of the foreign body response to cochlear implantation. Cochlear section from a CX3CR1/Thy1‐YFP C57BL6 mouse euthanized at day 8 post cochlear implantation, showing increased total cell and macrophage counts in the scala tympani. B, Cell nuclei are labeled bleu (Hoechst stain), macrophages green (CX3CR1‐GFP), and neurons yellow (Thy1‐YFP). C, Richardson's stain demonstrating the FBR after CI in a mouse cochlear section. Inflammatory cells and fibrosis can be seen along the electrode tract in the scala tympani. CI, cochlear implantation; FBR, foreign body response
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope. 2005;115:796‐802. - PubMed
    1. Gfeller KE, Olszewski C, Turner C, Gantz B, Oleson J. Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11(Suppl 1):12‐15. - PubMed
    1. Turner CW, Reiss LA, Gantz BJ. Combined acoustic and electric hearing: preserving residual acoustic hearing. Hear Res. 2008;242:164‐171. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woodson EA, Reiss LA, Turner CW, Gfeller K, Gantz BJ. The hybrid cochlear implant: a review. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:125‐134. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goman AM, Dunn CC, Gantz BJ, Lin FR. Prevalence of potential hybrid and conventional cochlear implant candidates based on audiometric profile. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39:515‐517. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources