Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 17:21:100712.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2019.100712. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Isothermal titration calorimetry and surface plasmon resonance analysis using the dynamic approach

Affiliations

Isothermal titration calorimetry and surface plasmon resonance analysis using the dynamic approach

Ganesh Kumar Krishnamoorthy et al. Biochem Biophys Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Biophysical techniques such as isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) are routinely used to ascertain the global binding mechanisms of protein-protein or protein-ligand interaction. Recently, Dumas etal, have explicitly modelled the instrument response of the ligand dilution and analysed the ITC thermogram to obtain kinetic rate constants. Adopting a similar approach, we have integrated the dynamic instrument response with the binding mechanism to simulate the ITC profiles of equivalent and independent binding sites, equivalent and sequential binding sites and aggregating systems. The results were benchmarked against the standard commercial software Origin-ITC. Further, the experimental ITC chromatograms of 2'-CMP + RNASE and BH3I-1 + hBCLXL interactions were analysed and shown to be comparable with that of the conventional analysis. Dynamic approach was applied to simulate the SPR profiles of a two-state model, and could reproduce the experimental profile accurately.

Keywords: Aggregation model; BH3I-1; Dynamic approach; Equivalent binding; ITC; Instrument response; RNASE; SPR; Sequential binding; hBCLXL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of the thermogram and the NDH data obtained for a single binding site mechanism using four different approaches. (A,B) without instrument response; (C,D) with instrument response based on lumped modelling; (E,F) with instrument response based on kinetic modelling in a sequential manner; (G,H) with instrument response based on kinetic modelling in a parallel manner.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Simulation of the ITC thermogram and its corresponding NDH data for different binding mechanisms (A,B) M equivalent single site binding; (C,D) M, N, two equivalent independent/parallel binding sites (FEOTF54); (E,F) M, N, two equivalent sequential binding sites (PROTDB). (G,H) M, N, O, R, four equivalent sequential binding sites (PERSSON). In the NDH plots of B, D, F, H, the open circle represents the NDH data points obtained independently through simulation based on algebraic model and the smooth line represents the NDH data obtained from integrating the simulated thermogram shown in A, C, E, G, respectively. The parameters used to simulate both algebraic and dynamic profiles (Table 1) were obtained through origin-ITC software by fitting the experimental data to appropriate models provided therein.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The experimental data and its model fit for (A) 2′-CMP + RNASE system using M equivalent single site binding, (B) BH3I-1 + hBCLXL using M, N, two sequential binding sites.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Simulation of the SPR sensogram using dynamic approach for a single binding site mechanism. (A) Without any leakage of ligand during the dissociation phase (B) with leakage of ligand during the dissociation phase. The concentrations of the ligand used for each instance of the simulation is labelled above its respective traces.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A comparison of the ligand dilution effect as addressed by ODE and PDE based dynamic modelling. The left and the right most figures represent the initial and final condition of the ligand concentrations immediately after injection and final equilibrium states, respectively. The darker shades represent higher concentration. In the upper scheme (ODE model), we assume an instantaneous mixing of sample being injected over discretized period of injection. Whereas, in the lower scheme (PDE model) we assume that the homogenization of the injected ligand is both time and spatial dependent.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Martinez J., Murciano-Calles J., Iglesias-Bexiga E., Luque I., Ruiz-Sanz J. Appl. Calorim. A Wide Context-Differ. Scanning Calorimetry, Isothermal Titration Calorim. Microcalorim. vols 73–104. 2013. Isothermal titration calorimetry: thermodynamic analysis of the binding thermograms of molecular recognition events by using equilibrium models. (There is no corresponding record for this reference.[Google Scholar])
    1. Jelesarov I., Bosshard H.R. Isothermal titration calorimetry and differential scanning calorimetry as complementary tools to investigate the energetics of biomolecular recognition. J. Mol. Recognit. 1999;12:3–18. - PubMed
    1. Pierce M.M., Raman C., Nall B.T. Isothermal titration calorimetry of protein–protein interactions. Methods. 1999;19:213–221. - PubMed
    1. Wiseman T., Williston S., Brandts J.F., Lin L.-N. Rapid measurement of binding constants and heats of binding using a new titration calorimeter. Anal. Biochem. 1989;179:131–137. - PubMed
    1. Freyer M.W., Lewis E.A. Isothermal titration calorimetry: experimental design, data analysis, and probing macromolecule/ligand binding and kinetic interactions. Methods Cell Biol. 2008;84:79–113. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources