Predictors of mortality in solid organ transplant recipients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales: The impact of cytomegalovirus disease and lymphopenia
- PMID: 31891235
- DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15769
Predictors of mortality in solid organ transplant recipients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales: The impact of cytomegalovirus disease and lymphopenia
Abstract
Treatment of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections in solid organ transplant recipients is challenging. The objective of this study was to develop a specific score to predict mortality in solid organ transplant recipients with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections. A multinational, retrospective (2004-2016) cohort study (INCREMENT-SOT, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02852902) was performed. The main outcome variable was 30-day all-cause mortality. The INCREMENT-SOT-CPE score was developed using logistic regression. The global cohort included 216 patients. The final logistic regression model included the following variables: INCREMENT-CPE mortality score ≥8 (8 points), no source control (3 points), inappropriate empirical therapy (2 points), cytomegalovirus disease (7 points), lymphopenia (4 points), and the interaction between INCREMENT-CPE score ≥8 and CMV disease (minus 7 points). This score showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.88) and classified patients into 3 strata: 0-7 (low mortality), 8-11 (high mortality), and 12-17 (very-high mortality). We performed a stratified analysis of the effect of monotherapy vs combination therapy among 165 patients who received appropriate therapy. Monotherapy was associated with higher mortality only in the very-high (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.82, 95% CI 1.13-7.06, P = .03) and high (HR 9.93, 95% CI 2.08-47.40, P = .004) mortality risk strata. A score-based algorithm is provided for therapy guidance.
Keywords: antibiotic drug resistance; clinical research/practice; infection and infectious agents - bacterial; infectious disease; organ transplantation in general.
© 2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
Comment in
-
CMV merits further evolutionary and biological view.Am J Transplant. 2020 May;20(5):1465-1466. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15820. Epub 2020 Mar 10. Am J Transplant. 2020. PMID: 32040884 No abstract available.
-
Reply to "CMV merits further evolutionary and biological view".Am J Transplant. 2020 May;20(5):1467-1468. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15867. Epub 2020 Apr 12. Am J Transplant. 2020. PMID: 32185864 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Nordmann P, Cuzon G, Naas T. The real threat of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:228-236.
-
- van Duin D, van Delden C; AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria infections in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:31-41.
-
- Satlin MJ, Jenkins SG, Walsh TJ. The global challenge of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae in transplant recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:1274-1283.
-
- Aguado JM, Silva JT, Fernández-Ruiz M, et al. Management of multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacilli infections in solid organ transplant recipients: SET/GESITRA-SEIMC/REIPI recommendations. Transplant Rev. 2018;32:36-57.
-
- Carrara E, Bragantini D, Tacconelli E. Combination versus monotherapy for the treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018;31:1.
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
