Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center
- PMID: 31893344
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-01039-5
Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center
Abstract
The objective of this study is to evaluate if surgeon volume and stratifying positive surgical margins (PSM) into focal and non-focal may differentially impact the risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Between January 2013 and December 2017, 732 consecutive patients were evaluated. The population included negative cases (control group) and PSM subjects (study group). PSMs were stratified as focal (≤ 1 mm) or non-focal (> 1 mm). A logistic regression model assessed the independent association of factors with the risk of PSM. The risk of BCR of PSM and other factors was assessed by Cox's multivariate proportional hazards. Overall, 192 (26.3%) patients had PSM focal in 133 patients; non-focal in 59 cases. Focal PSM was associated with the percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC; OR 1.011; p = 0.015), extra-capsular extension (pT3a stage; OR 2.064; p = 0.016), seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b; OR 2.150; p = 0.010), body mass index (odds ratio, OR 0.914; p = 0.006), and high surgeon volume (OR 0.574; p = 0.006). BPC (OR 1.013; p = 0.044), pT3a (OR 4.832; p < 0.0001) and pT3b stage (OR 5.153; p = 0.001) were independent predictors of the risk of non-focal PSM. Surgeon volume was not a predictor of non-focal PSM (p = 0.224). Independent factors associated with the risk of BCR were baseline PSA (hazard ratio, HR 1.064; p = 0.004), BPC (HR 1.015; p = 0.027), ISUP biopsy grade group (BGG) 2/3 (HR 2.966; p 0.003) and BGG 4/5 (HR 3.122; p = 0.022) pathologic grade group 4/5 (HR 3.257; p = 0.001), pT3b (HR 2.900; p = 0.003), and non-focal PSM (HR 2.287; p = 0.012). Surgeon volume was not a predictor of BCR (p = 0.253). High surgeon volume is an independent factor that lowers the risk of focal PSM. Surgeon volume does not affect non-focal PSM and BCR. Negative as well as focal PSM are not associated with BCR.
Keywords: Focal-positive surgical margins; Non-focal-positive surgical margins; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery.
Similar articles
-
The impact of positive surgical margin parameters and pathological stage on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0301653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301653. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38990870 Free PMC article.
-
Surgeon volume and body mass index influence positive surgical margin risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Results in 732 cases.Arab J Urol. 2019 May 30;17(3):234-242. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1619276. eCollection 2019. Arab J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31489241 Free PMC article.
-
High surgeon volume and positive surgical margins can predict the risk of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Ther Adv Urol. 2019 Sep 24;11:1756287219878283. doi: 10.1177/1756287219878283. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Urol. 2019. PMID: 31579118 Free PMC article.
-
Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.Eur Urol. 2018 May;73(5):664-671. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.035. Epub 2017 Dec 19. Eur Urol. 2018. PMID: 29273404
-
The importance of surgical margins in prostate cancer.J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;113(3):310-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.24109. Epub 2016 Mar 23. J Surg Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27004601 Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of positive surgical margin parameters and pathological stage on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0301653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301653. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38990870 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of prognostic group classification on prostate cancer progression in intermediate-risk patients according to the European Association of Urology system: results in 479 patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at a single tertiary referral center.Ther Adv Urol. 2024 Feb 11;16:17562872241229260. doi: 10.1177/17562872241229260. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Urol. 2024. PMID: 38348129 Free PMC article.
-
Association between ABO blood group and unfavorable prostate cancer features after radical prostatectomy: Retrospective study of 1149 patients.Curr Urol. 2022 Dec;16(4):256-261. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000146. Epub 2022 Aug 31. Curr Urol. 2022. PMID: 36714226 Free PMC article.
-
Development of risk-score model in patients with negative surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 31;14(1):7607. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58279-1. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38556562 Free PMC article.
-
The CAPRA-S score versus subtypes of minimal residual disease to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.Ecancermedicalscience. 2020 Jun 25;14:1063. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1063. eCollection 2020. Ecancermedicalscience. 2020. PMID: 32728379 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous