Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;577(7788):89-94.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6. Epub 2020 Jan 1.

International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening

Affiliations

International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening

Scott Mayer McKinney et al. Nature. 2020 Jan.

Erratum in

  • Addendum: International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening.
    McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V, Godwin J, Antropova N, Ashrafian H, Back T, Chesus M, Corrado GS, Darzi A, Etemadi M, Garcia-Vicente F, Gilbert FJ, Halling-Brown M, Hassabis D, Jansen S, Karthikesalingam A, Kelly CJ, King D, Ledsam JR, Melnick D, Mostofi H, Peng L, Reicher JJ, Romera-Paredes B, Sidebottom R, Suleyman M, Tse D, Young KC, De Fauw J, Shetty S. McKinney SM, et al. Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7829):E19. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2679-9. Nature. 2020. PMID: 33057216 No abstract available.

Abstract

Screening mammography aims to identify breast cancer at earlier stages of the disease, when treatment can be more successful1. Despite the existence of screening programmes worldwide, the interpretation of mammograms is affected by high rates of false positives and false negatives2. Here we present an artificial intelligence (AI) system that is capable of surpassing human experts in breast cancer prediction. To assess its performance in the clinical setting, we curated a large representative dataset from the UK and a large enriched dataset from the USA. We show an absolute reduction of 5.7% and 1.2% (USA and UK) in false positives and 9.4% and 2.7% in false negatives. We provide evidence of the ability of the system to generalize from the UK to the USA. In an independent study of six radiologists, the AI system outperformed all of the human readers: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) for the AI system was greater than the AUC-ROC for the average radiologist by an absolute margin of 11.5%. We ran a simulation in which the AI system participated in the double-reading process that is used in the UK, and found that the AI system maintained non-inferior performance and reduced the workload of the second reader by 88%. This robust assessment of the AI system paves the way for clinical trials to improve the accuracy and efficiency of breast cancer screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • AI shows promise for breast cancer screening.
    Pisano ED. Pisano ED. Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7788):35-36. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03822-8. Nature. 2020. PMID: 31894156 No abstract available.
  • AI outperforms radiologists in mammographic screening.
    Killock D. Killock D. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar;17(3):134. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0329-7. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31965085 No abstract available.
  • Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence.
    Haibe-Kains B, Adam GA, Hosny A, Khodakarami F; Massive Analysis Quality Control (MAQC) Society Board of Directors; Waldron L, Wang B, McIntosh C, Goldenberg A, Kundaje A, Greene CS, Broderick T, Hoffman MM, Leek JT, Korthauer K, Huber W, Brazma A, Pineau J, Tibshirani R, Hastie T, Ioannidis JPA, Quackenbush J, Aerts HJWL. Haibe-Kains B, et al. Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7829):E14-E16. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2766-y. Epub 2020 Oct 14. Nature. 2020. PMID: 33057217 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Tabár, L. et al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 260, 658–663 (2011). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Lehman, C. D. et al. National performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography: update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Radiology 283, 49–58 (2017). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 68, 394–424 (2018). - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40–74 years. CMAJ 183, 1991–2001 (2011). - PMC - DOI
    1. Marmot, M. G. et al. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Br. J. Cancer 108, 2205–2240 (2013). - PubMed - PMC - DOI

Publication types