Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Apr;104(1):1-15.
doi: 10.1007/s12306-019-00634-x. Epub 2020 Jan 1.

Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review

M Formica et al. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to summarize and critically analyze the influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spine diseases. A systematic review of the literature was carried out with a primary search being performed on Medline through PubMed. The 2009 PRISMA flowchart and checklist were taken into account. Sixty-seven articles were included in the analysis: 48 studies were level IV of evidence, whereas 19 were level III. All interbody fusion techniques analyzed have proved to reach a good fusion rate. An overall mean fusion rate of 93% (95% CI 92-95%, p < 0.001) was estimated pooling the selected studies. The influence of sagittal parameters and cages features in fusion rate was not clear. Autograft is considered the gold standard material. The use of synthetic bone substitutes and biological factors alone or combined with bone graft have shown conflicting results. Low level of evidence studies and high heterogeneity (χ2 = 271.4, df = 72, p < 0.001; I2 = 73.5%, τ2 = 0.05) in data analysis could result in the risk of bias. Further high-quality studies would better clarify these results in the future.

Keywords: Degenerative lumbar spinal surgery; Fusion rate; Lumbar interbody fusion; Non-union; Outcome; Risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jan 1;43(1):E29-E34 - PubMed
    1. Eur Spine J. 2012 Jul;21(7):1324-30 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1749-61 - PubMed
    1. World Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;105:612-622 - PubMed
    1. Eur Spine J. 2005 Aug;14(6):551-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources