Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Oct;32(4):1544-1554.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579419001482.

The long-term indirect effect of the early Family Check-Up intervention on adolescent internalizing and externalizing symptoms via inhibitory control

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The long-term indirect effect of the early Family Check-Up intervention on adolescent internalizing and externalizing symptoms via inhibitory control

Rochelle F Hentges et al. Dev Psychopathol. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

This study examined the long-term effects of a randomized controlled trial of the Family Check-Up (FCU) intervention initiated at age 2 on inhibitory control in middle childhood and adolescent internalizing and externalizing problems. We hypothesized that the FCU would promote higher inhibitory control in middle childhood relative to the control group, which in turn would be associated with lower internalizing and externalizing symptomology at age 14. Participants were 731 families, with half (n = 367) of the families assigned to the FCU intervention. Using an intent-to-treat design, results indicate that the FCU intervention was indirectly associated with both lower internalizing and externalizing symptoms at age 14 via its effect on increased inhibitory control in middle childhood (i.e., ages 8.5-10.5). Findings highlight the potential for interventions initiated in toddlerhood to have long-term impacts on self-regulation processes, which can further reduce the risk for behavioral and emotional difficulties in adolescence.

Keywords: externalizing; inhibitory control; internalizing; intervention; longitudinal effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Structural equation model. Path coefficients are standardized estimates. Covariates are presented at the bottom, and all outcomes were estimated with only significant pathways shown. Correlations between all covariates, with the exception of the randomly assigned intervention condition, were estimated but are not shown for clarity. Please see Table 1 for correlations between covariates. PA, Pennsylvania. VA, Virginia. PC, primary caregiver. IC, inhibitory control. FCU, Family Check-Up. (PC), primary caregiver report. (T), teacher report. Gender: 1 = male, 2 = female. Child race: 1 = White, 2 = minority. FCU: 0 = control, 1 = intervention. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.

References

    1. Achenbach T, & Rescorla L. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA preschool scales and profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
    1. Achenbach TM, & Rescorla LA. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles: Child behavior checklist for ages 6–18, Teacher’s Report Form, & Youth Self-Report. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth & Families.
    1. Bell MA, Wolfe CD, & Adkins DR. (2007). Frontal lobe development during infancy and childhood In Coch D, Dawson G, & Fischer KW. (Eds.), Human behavior, learning, and the developing brain: Typical development (pp. 247–276). New York: Guilford Press.
    1. Belsky J, & Beaver KM. (2011). Cumulative-genetic plasticity, parenting and adolescent self-regulation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 619–626. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02327.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Best JR, & Miller PH. (2010). A developmental perspective on executive function. Child Development, 81, 1641–1660. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources