Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;108(1):36-46.
doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.492. Epub 2020 Jan 1.

Continuing education for systematic reviews: a prospective longitudinal assessment of a workshop for librarians

Affiliations

Continuing education for systematic reviews: a prospective longitudinal assessment of a workshop for librarians

Barbara L Folb et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: This prospective, longitudinal study explored the impact of a continuing education class on librarians' knowledge levels about and professional involvement with systematic reviews. Barriers to systematic review participation and the presence of formal systematic review services in libraries were also measured.

Methods: Participants completed web-based surveys at three points in time: pre-class, post-class, and six-months' follow-up. Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographics and survey questions. Linear mixed effects models assessed knowledge score changes over time.

Results: Of 160 class attendees, 140 (88%) completed the pre-class survey. Of those 140, 123 (88%) completed the post-class survey, and 103 (74%) completed the follow-up survey. There was a significant increase (p<0.00001) from pre-class to post-class in knowledge test scores, and this increase was maintained at follow-up. At post-class, 69% or more of participants intended to promote peer review of searches, seek peer review of their searches, search for grey literature, read or follow published guidelines on conduct and documentation of systematic reviews, and ask for authorship on a systematic review. Among librarians who completed a systematic review between post-class and follow-up, 73% consulted published guidelines, 52% searched grey literature, 48% sought peer review, 57% asked for authorship, and 70% received authorship.

Conclusions: Attendance at this continuing education class was associated with positive changes in knowledge about systematic reviews and in librarians' systematic review-related professional practices. This suggests that in-depth professional development classes can help librarians develop skills that are needed to meet library patrons' changing service needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Systematic review behaviors (reported at pre-class and follow-up) and intention to engage in behaviors (reported at post-class)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yost J, Ciliska D, Dobbins M. Evaluating the impact of an intensive education workshop on evidence-informed decision making knowledge, skills, and behaviours: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jan 17;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-13. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brandt KA, Sapp JR, Campbell JM. “Current topics in health sciences librarianship”: a pilot program for network-based lifelong learning. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996 Oct;84(4):515–23. (Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC226191. [cited 25 Sep 2019].) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Konn T, Roberts N. Academic librarians and continuing education: a study of personal attitudes and opinions. J Libr. 1984 Oct;16(4):262–80. doi: 10.1177/096100068401600403. - DOI
    1. Smith D, Burgin R. The motivations of professional and paraprofessional librarians for participating in continuing education programs. Libr Inf Sci Res. 1991 Oct-Dec;13(4):405–29.
    1. Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Transferring learning to behavior using the four levels to improve performance. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2005.

LinkOut - more resources