Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May;97(5):677-687.
doi: 10.1111/cge.13698. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

Non-syndromic X linked intellectual disability: Current knowledge in light of the recent advances in molecular and functional studies

Affiliations
Review

Non-syndromic X linked intellectual disability: Current knowledge in light of the recent advances in molecular and functional studies

María Isabel Tejada et al. Clin Genet. 2020 May.

Abstract

Since the discovery of the FMR1 gene and the clinical and molecular characterization of Fragile X Syndrome in 1991, more than 141 genes have been identified in the X-chromosome in these 28 years thanks to applying continuously evolving molecular techniques to X-linked intellectual disability (XLID) families. In the past decade, array comparative genomic hybridization and next generation sequencing technologies have accelerated gene discovery exponentially. Classically, XLID has been subdivided in syndromic intellectual disability (S-XLID)-where intellectual disability (ID) is always associated with other recognizable physical and/or neurological features-and non-specific or non-syndromic intellectual disability (NS-XLID) where the only common feature is ID. Nevertheless, new advances on the study of these entities have showed that this classification is not always clear-cut because distinct variants in several of these XLID genes can result in S-XLID as well as in NS-XLID. This review focuses on the current knowledge on the XLID genes involved in non-syndromic forms, with the emphasis on their pathogenic mechanism, thus allowing the possibility to elucidate why some of them can give both syndromic and non-syndromic phenotypes.

Keywords: X-linked intellectual disability; non-syndromic-intellectual disability; syndromic-intellectual disability.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. The American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2010;48(4):307-309. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-48.4.307.
    1. Maulik PK, Mascarenhas MN, Mathers CD, Dua T, Saxena S. Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(2):419-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.018.
    1. McKenzie K, Milton M, Smith G, Ouellette-Kuntz H. Systematic review of the prevalence and incidence of intellectual disabilities: current trends and issues. Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2016;3(2):104-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-016-0085-7.
    1. Leonard H, Wen X. The epidemiology of mental retardation: challenges and opportunities in the new millennium. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8(3):117-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.10031.
    1. Roeleveld N, Zielhuis GA, Gabreëls F. The prevalence of mental retardation: a critical review of recent literature. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39(2):125-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07395.x.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources