Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar-Apr;22(2):140-144.
doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_126_19.

Transurethral resection of the prostate stricture management

Affiliations
Review

Transurethral resection of the prostate stricture management

Jian-Wei Wang et al. Asian J Androl. 2020 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

For more than nine decades, transurethral resection of the prostate remains the gold standard for the surgical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction. The occurrence of urethral strictures after transurethral resection of the prostate is one of the major late complications and has been reported as the leading cause of iatrogenic urethral strictures in patients older than 45 years who underwent urethroplasty. Although several postulations have been proposed to explain the urethral stricture after transurethral resection of the prostate, the exact etiology of urethral stricture after TURP is still controversial. Suggested etiological factors of urethral stricture formation after transurethral resection of the prostate include infection, mechanical trauma, prolonged indwelling catheter time, use of local anesthesia, and electrical injury by a stray current. One single treatment option is not appropriate for all stricture types. The management of urethral stricture following transurethral resection of the prostate includes minimally invasive endoscopic methods, including urethral dilation and direct visual incision, or open surgical procedures with varying urethroplasty techniques. Although scientific studies focusing on urethral strictures after transurethral resection of the prostate are relatively limited and sparse, we can apply the principles of urethral stricture management before making decisions on individual stricture treatment.

Keywords: benign prostatic hyperplasia; transurethral resection of the prostate; urethral stricture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

References

    1. Mamoulakis C, Schulze M, Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, Scarpa RM, et al. Midterm results from an international multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar with monopolar transurethral resection of prostate. Eur Urol. 2013;63:667–76. - PubMed
    1. Gravas S, Cornu JN, Drake MJ, Gacci M, Gratzke C, et al. Management of Non-Neurogenic Male LUST European Association of Urology Web Site. [Last accessed on 2019 Aug 31]. Available from: http://uroweborg/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts/#5 .
    1. Autorino R, Damiano R, Lorenzo GD, Quato G, Perdonà S, et al. Four-year outcome of a prospective randomized trial comparing bipolar plasmakinetic and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur Urol. 2009;55:922–9. - PubMed
    1. Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP) – incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol. 2006;50:969–79. - PubMed
    1. Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, Rosette JD, Gilling P, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol. 2015;67:1066–96. - PubMed