Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 26;46(2):231-235.
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbz115.

Involuntary Detention and Treatment: Are We Edging Toward a "Paradigm Shift"?

Affiliations

Involuntary Detention and Treatment: Are We Edging Toward a "Paradigm Shift"?

George Szmukler. Schizophr Bull. .

Abstract

Recent challenges to conventional mental health laws concerning involuntary detention and treatment of persons with a mental disorder have led to proposals, or indeed an insistence, that fundamental reform is necessary. A key theme has been the need to eliminate unfair discrimination against people with a mental disorder because their human rights are not respected on an equal basis with other people. Some proposals depart radically from conventional assumptions concerning the justification of involuntary detention and treatment. One is a "fusion law," a generic law applying to all persons lacking the ability to make a treatment decision, whether resulting from a "mental" or "physical" illness. An authoritative interpretation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) goes so far as to maintain that involuntary interventions are a violation of the Convention.

Keywords: capacity; coercion; disabilities; human rights.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Szmukler G. Men in White Coats: Treatment under Coercion. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2018.
    1. United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2006. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-right... - PubMed
    1. Jacob R, Gunn M, Holland A.. Mental Capacity Legislation: Principles and Practice. London, England: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2013.
    1. Richardson G. Mental capacity at the margin: the interface between two acts. Med Law Rev. 2010;18(1):56–77. - PubMed
    1. Booth Glen K, Changing paradigms: mental capacity, legal capacity guardianship, and beyond. Colum Hum Rts L Rev. 2012;44:93–170.

MeSH terms