Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 May;42(5):828-838.
doi: 10.1002/hed.26053. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first-line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib-randomized phase II study Commence

Janneke C Ham  1 , Esther van Meerten  2 , W Edward Fiets  3 , Laurens V Beerepoot  4 , Frank J F Jeurissen  5 , Marije Slingerland  6 , Marianne A Jonker  7 , Olga Husson  8   9 , Winette T A van der Graaf  1   10 , Carla M L van Herpen  1
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first-line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib-randomized phase II study Commence

Janneke C Ham et al. Head Neck. 2020 May.

Abstract

Background: Methotrexate in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has limited progression-free survival (PFS) benefit. We hypothesized that adding cetuximab to methotrexate improves PFS.

Methods: In the phase-Ib-study, patients with R/M SCCHN received methotrexate and cetuximab as first-line treatment. The primary objective was feasibility. In the phase-II-study patients were randomized to this combination or methotrexate alone (2:1). The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QoL).

Results: In six patients in the phase-Ib-study, no dose limiting toxicities were observed. In the phase II study, 30 patients received the combination and 15 patients methotrexate. In the phase-II-study median PFS was 4.5 months in the combination group vs 2.0 months in the methotrexate group (HR 0.37; P = .002). OS, toxicity, and QoL were not significantly different.

Conclusion: Cetuximab with methotrexate improved PFS without increased toxicity in R/M SCCHN-patients.

Keywords: cetuximab; first-line; methotrexate; palliative treatment; recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram of the enrollment of patients in the phase II study [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier estimates of progression free survival (A) and overall survival (B) according to the two treatment groups
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359‐E386. - PubMed
    1. Brockstein BE. Management of recurrent head and neck cancer: recent progress and future directions. Drugs. 2011;71(12):1551‐1559. - PubMed
    1. Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Platinum‐based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(11):1116‐1127. - PubMed
    1. Sacco AG, Cohen EE. Current treatment options for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(29):3305‐3313. - PubMed
    1. A phase III randomised trial of cistplatinum, methotrextate, cisplatinum + methotrexate and cisplatinum + 5‐FU in end stage squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Liverpool Head and Neck Oncology Group. Br J Cancer. 1990;61(2):311‐315. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms