Early versus delayed removal of the pericardial drain in patients with cardiac tamponade complicating radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation
- PMID: 31904158
- DOI: 10.1111/jce.14332
Early versus delayed removal of the pericardial drain in patients with cardiac tamponade complicating radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiac tamponade is a common life-threatening complication during radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (RAAF) and is mostly managed by pericardiocentesis. Thus far, the optimal timing for drain removal has not been established.
Methods and results: We retrospectively enrolled patients with cardiac tamponade complicating RAAF. The ablation was performed with interrupted novel oral anticoagulants, interrupted warfarin or uninterrupted warfarin protocols. An observation period of at least 30 minutes after the last aspiration via the drain was used to monitor the reaccumulation of pericardial fluid, and then, the patients were divided into an early removal (ER) group in the electrophysiology (EP) laboratory and a delayed removal (DR) group in the ward. A total of 51 patients were included: 25 patients in the ER group and 26 patients in the DR group. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between the two groups, and no cardiac tamponade reoccurred in either group in the ward. Unlike the DR group, the ER group showed an association with a decreased rate of chest pain (P = .000), fever (P = .001), nausea (P = .000), in-hospital recurrent AF (P = .010), and antibiotic use (P = .012). Anticoagulation was earlier (P = .009), and the median in-hospital stay was shorter (P = .001) in the ER group than in the DR group.
Conclusions: ER of the pericardial drain after no evidence of pericardial bleeding for at least 30 minutes in the EP laboratory is safe and associated with a better early hospital course.
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; cardiac tamponade; drain removal; early removal; radiofrequency ablation.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment in
-
Pericardial drain removal following atrial fibrillation ablation: The longer we delay, the more we pay.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Mar;31(3):604-606. doi: 10.1111/jce.14354. Epub 2020 Jan 24. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020. PMID: 31976604 No abstract available.
-
Time perception: What's "early"? What's "delayed"?J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jul;31(7):1880. doi: 10.1111/jce.14492. Epub 2020 Apr 16. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020. PMID: 32298031 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, et al. Prevalence and causes of fatal outcome in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1798-1803.
-
- Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen S-A, et al. Worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2005;111:1100-1105.
-
- Muthalaly RG, John RM, Schaeffer B, et al. Temporal trends in safety and complication rates of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29:854-860.
-
- Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Europace. 2012;14:528-606.
-
- Pedersen MEF, Leo M, Kalla M, et al. Management of tamponade complicating catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: early removal of pericardial drains is safe and effective and reduces analgesic requirements and hospital stay compared to conventional delayed removal. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3:367-373.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
