Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan:68:132-142.
doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Jan 3.

Machine and deep learning approaches for cancer drug repurposing

Affiliations
Review

Machine and deep learning approaches for cancer drug repurposing

Naiem T Issa et al. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Knowledge of the underpinnings of cancer initiation, progression and metastasis has increased exponentially in recent years. Advanced "omics" coupled with machine learning and artificial intelligence (deep learning) methods have helped elucidate targets and pathways critical to those processes that may be amenable to pharmacologic modulation. However, the current anti-cancer therapeutic armamentarium continues to lag behind. As the cost of developing a new drug remains prohibitively expensive, repurposing of existing approved and investigational drugs is sought after given known safety profiles and reduction in the cost barrier. Notably, successes in oncologic drug repurposing have been infrequent. Computational in-silico strategies have been developed to aid in modeling biological processes to find new disease-relevant targets and discovering novel drug-target and drug-phenotype associations. Machine and deep learning methods have especially enabled leaps in those successes. This review will discuss these methods as they pertain to cancer biology as well as immunomodulation for drug repurposing opportunities in oncologic diseases.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Drug discovery; Drug repurposing; Machine learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Overview of structure-based machine learning strategies for identification of drug-target interactions.
(A) Docking of small molecules into binding sites of three-dimensional protein target models. (B) Cheminformatics methods (i.e. QSAR) where chemical descriptors of small molecules are leveraged to create models relating descriptors to quantifiable target binding biological endpoints (i.e. binding vs non-binding, IC50, etc.). (C) Proteochemometrics similar to (B) but with additional descriptors derived from the protein target such as amino acid sequence.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Schematic of machine learning applied to (A) phenotypic and (B) transcriptomic data.
Bioassay data can be obtained from numerous publicly available databases such as PubChem, ChEMBL, TCGA and L1000 and implemented into machine learning systems.

References

    1. Ekins S, Puhl AC, Zorn KM, Lane TR, Russo DP, Klein JJ, et al. Exploiting machine learning for end-to-end drug discovery and development. Nat Mater. 2019;18(5):435–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nosengo N Can you teach old drugs new tricks? Nature. 2016;534(7607):314–6. - PubMed
    1. Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, Bajorath J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(11):935–49. - PubMed
    1. Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB, Halgren TA, Klicic JJ, Mainz DT, et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J Med Chem. 2004;47(7):1739–49. - PubMed
    1. Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31(2):455–61. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances