Signal Processing for the Profoundly Deaf
- PMID: 31905504
- DOI: 10.1080/00016489.1990.12088425
Signal Processing for the Profoundly Deaf
Abstract
Profound deafness, defined here as a hearing loss in excess of 90 dB, is characterized by high thresholds, reduced hearing range in the intensity and frequency domains, and poor resolution in the frequency and time domains. The high thresholds call for hearing aids with unusually high gains or remote microphones that can be placed close to the signal source. The former option creates acoustic feedback problems for which digital signal processing may yet offer solutions. The latter option calls for carrier wave technology that is already available. The reduced frequency and intensity ranges would appear to call for frequency and/or amplitude compression. It might also be argued, however, that any attempts to compress the acoustic signal into the limited hearing range of the profoundly deaf will be counterproductive because of poor frequency and time resolution, especially when the signal is present in noise. In experiments with a 2-channel compression system, only 1 of 9 subjects showed an improvement of perception with the introduction of fast-release (20 ms) compression. The other 8 experienced no benefit or a slight deterioration of performance. These results support the concept of providing the profoundly deaf with simpler, rather than more complex, patterns, perhaps through the use of feature extraction hearing aids. Data from users of cochlear implants already employing feature extraction techniques also support this concept.
Keywords: acoustic feedback; amplitude compression; cochlear implants; cue enhancement; feature extraction; frequency compression; frequency resolution; hearing aids; tactile aids; temporal resolution.
Similar articles
-
Signal processing for the profoundly deaf.Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990;469:166-71. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990. PMID: 2192531 Review.
-
Identification of Pure-Tone Audiologic Thresholds for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidacy: A Systematic Review.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jul 1;144(7):630-638. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0652. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018. PMID: 29800000
-
Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids.J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Dec;106(6):3603-19. doi: 10.1121/1.428213. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999. PMID: 10615700
-
What can we learn about hearing aids from cochlear implants?Ear Hear. 1991 Dec;12(6 Suppl):177S-186S. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199112001-00011. Ear Hear. 1991. PMID: 1794644 Review.
-
Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.Ear Hear. 2006 Oct;27(5):493-507. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000234635.48564.ce. Ear Hear. 2006. PMID: 16957500
Cited by
-
Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.Semin Hear. 2020 Aug;41(3):141-246. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714744. Epub 2020 Dec 16. Semin Hear. 2020. PMID: 33364673 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.Trends Amplif. 1998 Mar;3(1):6-44. doi: 10.1177/108471389800300102. Trends Amplif. 1998. PMID: 25425878 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous