Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec 30;17(1):249.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010249.

Assessing and Improving the Quality in Mental Health Services

Affiliations
Review

Assessing and Improving the Quality in Mental Health Services

Lampros Samartzis et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The mental health of the population consists of the three essential pillars of quality of life, economy, and society. Mental health services take care of the prevention and treatment of mental disorders and through them maintain, improve, and restore the mental health of the population. The purpose of this study is to describe the methodology for qualitative and quantitative evaluation and improvement of the mental health service system.

Methods: This is a narrative review study that searches the literature to provide criteria, indicators, and methodology for evaluating and improving the quality of mental health services and the related qualitative and quantitative indicators. The bibliography was searched in popular databases PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, using the keywords "mental", "health", "quality", "indicators", alone or in combinations thereof.

Results: Important quality indicators of mental health services have been collected and presented, and modified where appropriate. The definition of each indicator is presented here, alongside its method of calculation and importance. Each indicator belongs to one of the eight dimensions of quality assessment: (1) Suitability of services, (2) Accessibility of patients to services, (3) Acceptance of services by patients, (4) Ability of healthcare professionals to provide services, (5) Efficiency of health professionals and providers, (6) Continuity of service over time (ensuring therapeutic continuity), (7) Efficiency of health professionals and services, (8) Safety (for patients and for health professionals).

Discussion/conclusions: Accessibility and acceptability of service indicators are important for the attractiveness of services related to their use by the population. Profitability indicators are important economic indicators that affect the viability and sustainability of services, factors that are now taken into account in any health policy. All of the indicators mentioned are related to public health, affecting the quality of life, morbidity, mortality, and life expectancy, directly or indirectly. The systematic measurement and monitoring of indicators and the measurement and quantification of quality through them, are the basis for evidence-based health policy for improvement of the quality of mental health services.

Keywords: efficiency; medicine; mental health and quality; mental health services and effectiveness; psychiatric treatment; psychiatry; psychology; sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Vigo D., Thornicroft G., Atun R. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:171–178. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00505-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Recommendation on Mental Health Monitoring for EU. [(accessed on 21 December 2019)]; Available online: https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/32569168/EurPsych_Wahlbe....
    1. Kilbourne A.M., Beck K., Spaeth-Rublee B., Ramanuj P., O’Brien R.W., Tomoyasu N., Pincus H.A. Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: A global perspective. World Psychiatry. 2018;17:30–38. doi: 10.1002/wps.20482. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seddon M., Marshall M., Campbell S., Roland M. Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. BMJ Qual. Saf. 2001;10:152–158. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100152. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruggeri M. Why measuring quality of mental health care is still an unmet challenge and how to meet it. World Psychiatry. 2018;17:45. doi: 10.1002/wps.20488. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources