Effects of the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae on the Mortality and Immune Response of Locusta migratoria
- PMID: 31906210
- PMCID: PMC7022458
- DOI: 10.3390/insects11010036
Effects of the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae on the Mortality and Immune Response of Locusta migratoria
Abstract
Entomopathogenic fungi are the key regulators of insect populations and some of them are important biological agents used in integrated pest management strategies. Compared with their ability to become resistant to insecticides, insect pests do not easily become resistant to the infection by entomopathogenic fungi. In this study, we evaluated the mortality and immune response of the serious crop pest Locusta migratoria manilensis after exposure to a new entomopathogenic fungus strain, Metarhizium anisopliae CQMa421. M. anisopliae CQMa421 could effectively infect and kill the L. migratoria adults and nymphs. The locust LT50 under 1 × 108 conidia/mL concentration of M. anisopliae was much lower than that under conidial concentration 1 × 105 conidia/mL (i.e., 6.0 vs 11.2 and 5.0 vs 13.8 for adults and nymphs, respectively). The LC50 (log10) of M. anisopliae against locust adults and nymphs after 10 days was 5.2 and 5.6, respectively. Although the number of hemocytes in L. migratoria after exposure to M. anisopliae did not differ with that in the controls, the enzymatic activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and prophenoloxidase (ProPO) did differ between the two treatments. The activities of both SOD and ProPO under the M. anisopliae treatment were lower than that in the controls, except for the ProPO activity at 72 h and the SOD activity at 96 h. Further, the expression of the L. migratoria immune-related genes defensin, spaetzle, and attacin differed after exposure to M. anisopliae for 24 h to 96 h. Taken together, this study indicated that infection with M. anisopliae CQMa421 could cause the death of L. migratoria by interacting with the immune responses of the host, demonstrating that this fungal strain of M. anisopliae can be an efficient biocontrol agent against L. migratoria.
Keywords: Locusta migratoria; Metarhizium anisopliae; immune response; mortality; pest control.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Molecular identification and related functional characterization of the FKBP52 gene in immunity of Locusta migratoria manilensis (Orthoptera: Oedipodidae).J Econ Entomol. 2024 Jun 10;117(3):1130-1140. doi: 10.1093/jee/toae042. J Econ Entomol. 2024. PMID: 38579138
-
Suppression of Rice Planthopper Populations by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae without Affecting the Rice Microbiota.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020 Oct 15;86(21):e01337-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01337-20. Print 2020 Oct 15. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32859596 Free PMC article.
-
Different Effects of Metarhizium anisopliae Strains IMI330189 and IBC200614 on Enzymes Activities and Hemocytes of Locusta migratoria L.PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0155257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155257. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27227835 Free PMC article.
-
Interactions between Entomopathogenic Fungi and Insects and Prospects with Glycans.J Fungi (Basel). 2023 May 15;9(5):575. doi: 10.3390/jof9050575. J Fungi (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37233286 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy of Two Entomopathogenic Fungi, Metarhizium brunneum, Strain F52 Alone and Combined with Paranosema locustae against the Migratory Grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes, under Laboratory and Greenhouse Conditions.Insects. 2019 Mar 30;10(4):94. doi: 10.3390/insects10040094. Insects. 2019. PMID: 30935086 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Special Issue: Insects, Nematodes, and Their Symbiotic Bacteria.Insects. 2020 Aug 28;11(9):577. doi: 10.3390/insects11090577. Insects. 2020. PMID: 32872298 Free PMC article.
-
The Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae Affects Feeding Preference of Sogatella furcifera and Its Potential Targets' Identification.J Fungi (Basel). 2022 May 15;8(5):506. doi: 10.3390/jof8050506. J Fungi (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35628761 Free PMC article.
-
In silico analysis of promoter region and regulatory elements of mitogenome co-expressed trn gene clusters encoding for bio-pesticide in entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae: strain ME1.J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2021 Jun 22;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s43141-021-00191-6. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2021. PMID: 34156573 Free PMC article.
-
Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of Nilaparvata lugens microRNAs during Challenge with the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae.J Fungi (Basel). 2021 Apr 14;7(4):295. doi: 10.3390/jof7040295. J Fungi (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33919937 Free PMC article.
-
The symbiont Acinetobacter baumannii enhances the insect host resistance to entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae.Commun Biol. 2024 Sep 20;7(1):1184. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06779-1. Commun Biol. 2024. PMID: 39300313 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Vega F.E., Goettel M.S., Blackwell M., Chandler D., Jackson M.A., Keller S., Koike M., Maniania N.K., Monzón A., Ownley B.H., et al. Fungal entomopathogens: New insights on their ecology. Fungal Ecol. 2009;2:149–159. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2009.05.001. - DOI
-
- De Faria M.R., Wraight S.P. Mycoinsecticides and Mycoacaricides: A comprehensive list with worldwide coverage and international classification of formulation types. Biol. Control. 2007;43:237–256. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.001. - DOI
-
- Zimmermann G. Review on safety of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium Anisopliae. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2007;17:879–920. doi: 10.1080/09583150701593963. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources