Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 2;9(1):129.
doi: 10.3390/jcm9010129.

Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Procedure for Endodontic Access Cavities: An in Vitro Study

Affiliations

Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Procedure for Endodontic Access Cavities: An in Vitro Study

Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

: Purpose: To analyze the accuracy of two computer-aided navigation techniques to guide the performance of endodontic access cavities compared with the conventional access procedure.

Materials and methods: A total of 30 single-rooted anterior teeth were selected, which were randomly distributed into three study groups: Group A-guided performance of endodontic access cavities through computer-aided static navigation system (n = 10) (SN); Group B-guided performance of endodontic access cavities through computer-aided dynamic navigation system (n = 10) (DN); and Group C-manual (freehand) performance of endodontic access cavities (n = 10) (MN). The endodontic access cavities of the SN group were performed with a stereolithography template designed on 3D implant planning software, based on preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and a 3D extraoral surface scan, and endodontic access cavities of the DN group were planned and performed by the dynamic navigation system. After endodontic access cavities were performed, a second CBCT was done, and the degree of accuracy between the planned and performed endodontic access cavities was analyzed using therapeutic planning software and Student's t-test.

Results: Paired t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between SN and DN at the coronal (p = 0.6542), apical (p = 0.9144), or angular (p = 0.0724) level; however, statistically significant differences were observed between the two computer-aided navigation techniques and the MN group at the coronal (p < 0.0001), apical (p < 0.0001), and angular (p < 0.0001) level.

Conclusion: Both computer-aided static and dynamic navigation procedures allowed accurate performance of endodontic access cavities.

Keywords: computer-assisted treatment; endodontic access cavity; endodontics; image-guided treatment; navigation system; real-time tracking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A,B) Endodontic access cavities planned with the computer-aided static navigation system incorporating the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan (pink lines); (C,D) virtual template design according to planned virtual endodontic access cavities; and (E) manufactured stereolithography template fixed over dental surface of teeth placed over epoxy resin model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Planning endodontic access cavities with treatment planning software of computer-aided dynamic navigation system (yellow cylinders), and (B) performing endodontic access cavities (green cylinders) controlled in all planes and depth with the black-and-white jaw tag fixed over the dental surface of the teeth with the thermoplastic template and the black-and-white drill tag (red arrow) attached to the high-speed handpiece (green arrow).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A,B) Planned endodontic access cavities (yellow cylinders) and access cavities performed manually (red cylinders). Guided endodontic access cavities planned and performed through (C,D) computer-aided static navigation system and (E,F) computer-aided dynamic navigation system.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reeh E.S., Messer H.H., Douglas W.H. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J. Endod. 1989;15:512–516. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80191-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Plotino G., Grande N.M., Isufi A., Ioppolo P., Pedulla E., Bedini R., Gambarini G., Testarelli L. Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Different Access Cavity Designs. J. Endod. 2017;43:995–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clark D., Khademi J. Modern Molar Endodontic Access and Directed Dentin Conservation. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2010;54:249–273. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2010.01.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macho Á.Z., Ferreiroa A., Rico-Romano C., Alonso-Ezpeleta L.Ó., Mena-Álvarez J. Diagnosis and endodontic treatment of type II dens invaginatus by using cone-beam computed tomography and splint guides for cavity access: A case report. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2015;146:266–270. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2014.11.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mena-Álvarez J., Rico-Romano C., Lobo-Galindo A.B., Zubizarreta-Macho Á. Endodontic treatment of dens evaginatus by performing a splint guided access cavity. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2017;29:396–402. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12314. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources