Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;122(4):473-482.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0653-9. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

Effective delivery of Complex Innovative Design (CID) cancer trials-A consensus statement

Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

Effective delivery of Complex Innovative Design (CID) cancer trials-A consensus statement

Sarah P Blagden et al. Br J Cancer. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

The traditional cancer drug development pathway is increasingly being superseded by trials that address multiple clinical questions. These are collectively termed Complex Innovative Design (CID) trials. CID trials not only assess the safety and toxicity of novel anticancer medicines but also their efficacy in biomarker-selected patients, specific cancer cohorts or in combination with other agents. They can be adapted to include new cohorts and test additional agents within a single protocol. Whilst CID trials can speed up the traditional route to drug licencing, they can be challenging to design, conduct and interpret. The Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC) network, funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Cancer Research UK (CRUK) and the Health Boards of Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland, formed a working group with relevant stakeholders from clinical trials units, the pharmaceutical industry, funding bodies, regulators and patients to identify the main challenges of CID trials. The working group generated ten consensus recommendations. These aim to improve the conduct, quality and acceptability of oncology CID trials in clinical research and, importantly, to expedite the process by which effective treatments can reach cancer patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. CID Trial Pathway (adapted from the NIHR Clinical Trials Toolkit Routemap) showing the stages of clinical trial development leading to licensing and approval (blue).
Stages shown in red correspond to Consensus Recommendations defined in this paper that are of particular relevance to CID trials.

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. All cancers fact sheet. Globocan, 2018. http://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/39-All-cancers-fact-she... (2018).
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cancer tomorrow—Estimated number of incident cases from 2018 to 2040, all cancers, both sexes, all ages. https://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow/graphic-isotype?type=0&;population=900&mode... (2018).
    1. The Institute of Cancer Research. From Patent to Patient—Analysing access to innovative cancer drugs. https://d1ijoxngr27nfi.cloudfront.net/docs/default-source/default-docume... (2018).
    1. Bhatt, D. L. & Mehta C. Adaptive designs for clinical trials. 10.1056/NEJMra1510061. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMra1510061 (2016). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Renfro LA, Mandrekar SJ. Definitions and statistical properties of master protocols for personalized medicine in oncology. J. Biopharm. Stat. 2018;28:217–228. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1372778. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances