Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019:60:1-24.
doi: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2019.02.001.

Adaptive capacity in ecosystems

Affiliations

Adaptive capacity in ecosystems

David G Angeler et al. Adv Ecol Res. 2019.

Abstract

Understanding the adaptive capacity of ecosystems to cope with change is crucial to management. However, unclear and often confusing definitions of adaptive capacity make application of this concept difficult. In this paper, we revisit definitions of adaptive capacity and operationalize the concept. We define adaptive capacity as the latent potential of an ecosystem to alter resilience in response to change. We present testable hypotheses to evaluate complementary attributes of adaptive capacity that may help further clarify the components and relevance of the concept. Adaptive sampling, inference and modeling can reduce key uncertainties incrementally over time and increase learning about adaptive capacity. Such improvements are needed because uncertainty about global change and its effect on the capacity of ecosystems to adapt to social and ecological change is high.

Keywords: adaptive capacity; ecological memory; ecological traits; global change; management; resilience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Schematics illustrating high (A) and low (B) adaptive capacity. Adaptive capacity as a latent potential is shown by the dotted lines and the lengths of arrows that surround the basins of attraction that represent ecological resilience (left drawings). Drawings on the right show how high and low adaptive capacity can translate in rebound or a regime shift after a disturbance.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Reiterative testing, recalibrating, and refining of explicit hypotheses of adaptive capacity within an adaptive management, inference and modeling framework. The approach first recognizes patterns (reducing risk of type II error) and then refines knowledge about patterns reiteratively (reducing risk of type I error) to meet adaptive or transformative management objectives and reduce uncertainty.

References

    1. Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE), pp. 1–22. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
    1. Allen CR, Gunderson L, Johnson AR (2005) The use of discontinuities and functional groups to assess relative resilience in complex systems. Ecosystems 8, 958–966.
    1. Allen CR & Holling CS (2008) Discontinuities in ecosystems and other complex systems. Columbia University Press, New York.
    1. Allen CR, Angeler DG, Cumming GS, Folke C, Twidwell D, & Uden DR (2016). Quantifying spatial resilience. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53(3), 625–635.
    1. Allen CR, Fontaine JJ, Pope KL, Garmestani AS (2011) Adaptive management for a turbulent future. J Environ Manag 92:1339–1345 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources