Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec 30:14:35.
doi: 10.1186/s12263-019-0656-4. eCollection 2019.

Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review

Affiliations
Review

Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review

Cătălina Cuparencu et al. Genes Nutr. .

Abstract

Meat, including fish and shellfish, represents a valuable constituent of most balanced diets. Consumption of different types of meat and fish has been associated with both beneficial and adverse health effects. While white meats and fish are generally associated with positive health outcomes, red and especially processed meats have been associated with colorectal cancer and other diseases. The contribution of these foods to the development or prevention of chronic diseases is still not fully elucidated. One of the main problems is the difficulty in properly evaluating meat intake, as the existing self-reporting tools for dietary assessment may be imprecise and therefore affected by systematic and random errors. Dietary biomarkers measured in biological fluids have been proposed as possible objective measurements of the actual intake of specific foods and as a support for classical assessment methods. Good biomarkers for meat intake should reflect total dietary intake of meat, independent of source or processing and should be able to differentiate meat consumption from that of other protein-rich foods; alternatively, meat intake biomarkers should be specific to each of the different meat sources (e.g., red vs. white; fish, bird, or mammal) and/or cooking methods. In this paper, we present a systematic investigation of the scientific literature while providing a comprehensive overview of the possible biomarker(s) for the intake of different types of meat, including fish and shellfish, and processed and heated meats according to published guidelines for biomarker reviews (BFIrev). The most promising biomarkers are further validated for their usefulness for dietary assessment by published validation criteria.

Keywords: Biomarkers of food intake; Fish; Poultry; Processed meat; Protein sources; Red meat; Seafood.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests; however, LOD received funding in 2012 from the Danish meat industry to support work on meat intake biomarker development.

References

    1. Wu G. Dietary protein intake and human health. Food Funct. 2016;7(3):1251–1265. doi: 10.1039/C5FO01530H. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Smet S, Vossen E. Meat: The balance between nutrition and health. A review. Meat Sci. 2016;120:145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lingbeck JM, Cordero P, O'Bryan CA, Johnson MG, Ricke SC, Crandall PG. Functionality of liquid smoke as an all-natural antimicrobial in food preservation. Meat Sci. 2014;97(2):197–206. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.02.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Micha R, Wallace SK, Mozaffarian D. Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2010;121(21):2271–2283. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924977. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abete I, Romaguera D, Vieira AR, Lopez de Munain A, Norat T. Association between total, processed, red and white meat consumption and all-cause, CVD and IHD mortality: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Br J Nutr. 2014;112(5):762–775. doi: 10.1017/S000711451400124X. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources