Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec;14(4):469-475.
doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.88749. Epub 2019 Oct 15.

Laparoscopic approach to pelvic organ prolapse - the way to go or a blind alley?

Affiliations
Review

Laparoscopic approach to pelvic organ prolapse - the way to go or a blind alley?

Ewelina Malanowska et al. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse represents a relatively frequent diagnosis that requires attention due to its detrimental effect on quality of life. Not surprisingly, it is one of the commonest indications for surgery in premenopausal and postmenopausal women, often requiring a complex multidisciplinary approach. Traditional vaginal procedures are being gradually replaced by laparoscopic techniques, offering anticipated benefits in reduced recurrence and complication rates, while respecting the trend towards uterus sparing if desirable. Recently, questions about the safety of alloplastic materials used in pelvic organ prolapse surgery were raised, leading to official restrictions in their use, particularly for transvaginal application. As a result, laparoscopic procedures might appear slightly favored but caution must be taken to assure proper technique of mesh placement while maintaining high awareness of possible long-term mesh-related complications that require close surveillance. Therefore, adequate education and training becomes even more important to achieve optimal results and to avoid possible serious medico-legal charges.

Keywords: complications; laparoscopic surgery; laparoscopy; mesh; pelvic organ prolapse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Chow D, Rodríguez LV. Epidemiology and prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23:293–8. - PubMed
    1. Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1783–90. - PubMed
    1. Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. BMJ. 2016;354:i3853. - PubMed
    1. Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, et al. Pelvic Organ Prolapse quantification system (POP–Q) – a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. Med Life J. 2011;4:75–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeLancey JO. Anatomy and biomechanics of genital prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;36:897–909. - PubMed