Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 29:17:101021.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101021. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Provider reported implementation of nutrition-related practices in childcare centers and family childcare homes in rural and urban Nebraska

Affiliations

Provider reported implementation of nutrition-related practices in childcare centers and family childcare homes in rural and urban Nebraska

Dipti A Dev et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Approximately 15 million children under age 6 are in childcare settings, offering childcare providers an opportunity to influence children's dietary intake. Childcare settings vary in organizational structure - childcare centers (CCCs) vs. family childcare homes (FCCHs) - and in geographical location - urban vs. rural. Research on the nutrition-related best practices across these childcare settings is scarce. The objective of this study is to compare nutrition-related best practices of CCCs and FCCHs that participate in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) in rural and urban Nebraska. Nebraska providers (urban n = 591; rural n = 579) reported implementation level, implementation difficulty and barriers to implementing evidence-informed food served and mealtime practices. Chi-square tests comparing CCCs and FCCHs in urban Nebraska and CCCs and FCCHs in rural Nebraska showed sub-optimal implementation for some practices across all groups, including limiting fried meats and high sugar/ high fat foods, using healthier foods or non-food treats for celebrations and serving meals family style. Significant differences (p < .05) between CCCs and FCCHs also emerged, especially with regard to perceived barriers to implementing best practices. For example, CCCs reported not having enough money to cover the cost of meals for providers, lack of control over foods served and storage problems, whereas FCCHs reported lack of time to prepare healthier foods and sit with children during mealtimes. Findings suggest that policy and public health interventions may need to be targeted to address the unique challenges of implementing evidence-informed practices within different organizational structures and geographic locations.

Keywords: Childcare; Foods served; Mealtime practices; Nebraska; Nutrition; Rural–urban.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abarca-Gómez L., Abdeen Z.A., Hamid Z.A. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017;390(10113):2627–2642. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ammerman A.S., Ward D.S., Benjamin S.E. An intervention to promote healthy weight: Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Child Care (NAP SACC) theory and design. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2007;4(3):A67. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beauchamp G.K., Mennella J.A. Early flavor learning and its impact on later feeding behavior. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2009 - PubMed
    1. Benjamin S.E., Cradock A., Walker E.M., Slining M., Gillman M.W. Obesity prevention in child care: A review of U.S. state regulations. BMC Public Health. 2008 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benjamin Neelon S.E., Briley M.E. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Benchmarks for nutrition in child care. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2011;111(4):607–615. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources