Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 31:6:2499-2503.
doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.10.028. eCollection 2019.

High-resolution mapping of reciprocal translocation breakpoints using long-read sequencing

Affiliations

High-resolution mapping of reciprocal translocation breakpoints using long-read sequencing

Judy F C Chow et al. MethodsX. .

Abstract

Long-read nanopore sequencing enables direct high-resolution breakpoint mapping on balanced carriers of reciprocal translocation. The mean sequencing depth on the translocated chromosomes to achieve accurate mapping of breakpoints ranged from 2.5-fold to 6.2-fold. To speed up determination of the breakpoints from long-read sequencing data, alignment reads on the translocated chromosomes were extracted before piped into NanoSV. Checking the position of breakpoints on Interactive Genomics Viewer (IGV) was crucial to successful design of breakpoint PCR primers, especially when large deletion was involved at the breakpoints. •Long-read sequencing enables accurate breakpoint mapping with base-pair resolution•Splitting bam files by translocated chromosomes drastically speeded up the breakpoint determination•IGV helps to identify the breakpoint positions and facilitate the design of breakpoint PCR primers.

Keywords: Breakpoint; Nanopore sequencing; PGT-SR; Translocation breakpoint mapping using nanopore sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Aligned reads shown on IGV and Sanger sequencing results of derivative chromosomes of sample #100238. (A) Aligned reads on chromosome 2. (B) Aligned reads on chromosome 10. (C–D) Sanger sequencing results on der(2) and der (10) respectively, showing highly concordant results with IGV views. Red arrow indicates the breakpoints predicted by NanoSV.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Aligned reads shown on IGV and breakpoint PCR results of sample #100648. (A) Aligned reads on chromosome 8. (B) Aligned reads on chromosome 10. Red arrow indicates breakpoints predicted by NanoSV. (C) First breakpoint PCR results. Primers on chromosome 10 were designed (10 F and 10R) solely based on the predicted breakpoint (chr10:128,448,174). (D) Second breakpoint PCR results. Primer were designed (10 F2 and 10R2) based on the chimeric read (depicted in blue box) located at the 3′ end of predicted breakpoint, visualized on IGV. N: noncarrier; C: translocation carrier; B: negative control; M: DNA molecular weight marker.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chow J.F.C., Cheng H.H.Y., Lau E.Y.L., Yeung W.S.B., Ng E.H.Y. Distinguishing between carrier and noncarrier embryos with the use of long-read sequencing in preimplantation genetic testing for reciprocal translocations. Genomics. 2019 - PubMed
    1. Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(18):3094–3100. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cretu Stancu M., van Roosmalen M.J., Renkens I. Mapping and phasing of structural variation in patient genomes using nanopore sequencing. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1326. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zamani Esteki M., Dimitriadou E., Mateiu L. Concurrent whole-genome haplotyping and copy-number profiling of single cells. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2015;96(6):894–912. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Treff N.R., Thompson K., Rafizadeh M. SNP array-based analyses of unbalanced embryos as a reference to distinguish between balanced translocation carrier and normal blastocysts. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2016;33(8):1115–1119. - PMC - PubMed