Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;203(6):1117-1121.
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000742. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer Center

Affiliations

Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer Center

Sigrid Carlsson et al. J Urol. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: We studied the risk of metastatic prostate cancer development in men with Grade Group 2 disease managed with active surveillance at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Materials and methods: A total of 219 men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer had disease managed with active surveillance between 2000 and 2017. Biopsy was performed every 2 to 3 years, or upon changes in magnetic resonance imaging, prostate specific antigen level or digital rectal examination. The primary outcome was development of distant metastasis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate treatment-free survival.

Results: Median age at diagnosis was 67 years (IQR 61-72), median prostate specific antigen was 5 ng/ml (IQR 4-7) and most patients (69%) had nonpalpable disease. During followup 64 men received treatment, including radical prostatectomy in 36 (56%), radiotherapy in 20 (31%), hormone therapy in 3 (5%) and focal therapy in 5 (8%). Of the 36 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy 32 (89%) had Grade Group 2 disease on pathology and 4 (11%) had Grade Group 3 disease. Treatment-free survival was 61% (95% CI 52-70) at 5 years and 49% (95% CI 37-60) at 10 years. Three men experienced biochemical recurrence, no men had distant metastasis and no men died of prostate cancer during the followup. Median followup was 3.1 years (IQR 1.9-4.9).

Conclusions: Active surveillance appears to be a safe initial management strategy in the short term for carefully selected and closely monitored men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer treated at a tertiary cancer center. Definitive conclusions await further followup.

Keywords: neoplasm grading; prostatic neoplasms; watchful waiting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Treatment-free survival

Comment in

References

    1. Choo R, Klotz L, Danjoux C et al.: Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression. J Urol, 167: 1664, 2002 - PubMed
    1. Tosoian JJ, Mamawala M, Epstein JI et al.: Intermediate and Longer-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Active-Surveillance Program for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol, 33: 3379, 2015 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klotz L, Vesprini D, Sethukavalan P et al.: Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol, 33: 272, 2015 - PubMed
    1. Klotz L: Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol, 27: 225, 2017 - PubMed
    1. Bul M, Zhu X, Valdagni R et al.: Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study. Eur Urol, 63: 597, 2013 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms