Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer Center
- PMID: 31909690
- PMCID: PMC7685513
- DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000742
Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer Center
Abstract
Purpose: We studied the risk of metastatic prostate cancer development in men with Grade Group 2 disease managed with active surveillance at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Materials and methods: A total of 219 men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer had disease managed with active surveillance between 2000 and 2017. Biopsy was performed every 2 to 3 years, or upon changes in magnetic resonance imaging, prostate specific antigen level or digital rectal examination. The primary outcome was development of distant metastasis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate treatment-free survival.
Results: Median age at diagnosis was 67 years (IQR 61-72), median prostate specific antigen was 5 ng/ml (IQR 4-7) and most patients (69%) had nonpalpable disease. During followup 64 men received treatment, including radical prostatectomy in 36 (56%), radiotherapy in 20 (31%), hormone therapy in 3 (5%) and focal therapy in 5 (8%). Of the 36 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy 32 (89%) had Grade Group 2 disease on pathology and 4 (11%) had Grade Group 3 disease. Treatment-free survival was 61% (95% CI 52-70) at 5 years and 49% (95% CI 37-60) at 10 years. Three men experienced biochemical recurrence, no men had distant metastasis and no men died of prostate cancer during the followup. Median followup was 3.1 years (IQR 1.9-4.9).
Conclusions: Active surveillance appears to be a safe initial management strategy in the short term for carefully selected and closely monitored men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer treated at a tertiary cancer center. Definitive conclusions await further followup.
Keywords: neoplasm grading; prostatic neoplasms; watchful waiting.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2020 Jun;203(6):1121. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000742.01. Epub 2020 Mar 18. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 32186448 No abstract available.
-
Re: Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer CenterS. Carlsson, N. Benfante, R. Alvim, D. D. Sjoberg, A. Vickers, V. E. Reuter, S. W. Fine, H. A. Vargas, M. Wiseman, M. Mamoor, B. Ehdaie, V. Laudone, P. Scardino, J. Eastham and K. Touijer J Urol 2020; 203: 1117-1121.J Urol. 2020 Nov;204(5):1063-1064. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001291. Epub 2020 Jul 23. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 32698711 No abstract available.
References
-
- Choo R, Klotz L, Danjoux C et al.: Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression. J Urol, 167: 1664, 2002 - PubMed
-
- Klotz L, Vesprini D, Sethukavalan P et al.: Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol, 33: 272, 2015 - PubMed
-
- Klotz L: Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol, 27: 225, 2017 - PubMed
-
- Bul M, Zhu X, Valdagni R et al.: Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study. Eur Urol, 63: 597, 2013 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical