Comparison of chloral hydrate and midazolam by mouth as premedicants in children undergoing otolaryngological surgery
- PMID: 3190970
- DOI: 10.1093/bja/61.4.390
Comparison of chloral hydrate and midazolam by mouth as premedicants in children undergoing otolaryngological surgery
Abstract
Chloral hydrate 25, 50 or 75 mg kg-1 or midazolam 0.4, 0.5 or 0.6 mg kg-1, all given by mouth in combination with atropine 0.03 mg kg-1, were compared as premedication in 248 children in a randomized, double-blind study. Chloral hydrate was significantly less palatable than midazolam. The anxiolytic effect of chloral hydrate 75 mg kg-1 was "good" in children younger than 5 yr, whereas the other doses of chloral hydrate, and all doses of midazolam, provided only "fair" anxiolysis in this age group. All doses of both premedicants provided good anxiolysis in the older children. A satisfactory antisialogogue effect was seen in 83-90% of each group. About 20 min after extubation, restlessness was observed in 15-25% of the younger children premedicated with chloral hydrate 25 mg kg-1 or with midazolam 0.4 or 0.6 mg kg-1. The mean total recovery score (0-10) based on activity, ventilation, heart rate, conscious level and colour ranged between 5.8 and 6.8 at 10 min and between 9 and 9.5 at 70 min after extubation in all groups. Midazolam 0.5 mg kg-1 is recommended for children less than 5 yr of age and midazolam 0.4-0.5 mg kg-1 for older ones. Chloral hydrate 75 mg kg-1 provided good anxiolysis in both age groups; however, it was less palatable than the midazolam.
Similar articles
-
Oral premedication in children: a comparison of chloral hydrate, diazepam, alprazolam, midazolam and placebo for day surgery.Anaesth Intensive Care. 1990 May;18(2):185-93. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9001800205. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1990. PMID: 2368891 Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of premedication at the time of separation from parent and mask induction in paediatric patients coming for congenital heart disease surgery.J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012 May;22(5):280-4. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012. PMID: 22538030
-
A comparative study on the sedative effect of oral midazolam and oral chloral hydrate medication in lumbar puncture.Acta Med Croatica. 2013 Dec;67(5):401-5. Acta Med Croatica. 2013. PMID: 24979880 Clinical Trial.
-
Question 1. Chloral hydrate or midazolam: which is better for sedating children for painless diagnostic imaging?Arch Dis Child. 2012 Aug;97(8):750-2. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301116. Arch Dis Child. 2012. PMID: 22859428 Review. No abstract available.
-
Anxiolytic activity of chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine.Pediatr Dent. 1994 May-Jun;16(3):183-9. Pediatr Dent. 1994. PMID: 8058541 Review.
Cited by
-
Is midazolam superior to triclofos and hydroxyzine as premedicant in children?J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jan;30(1):53-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.125704. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014. PMID: 24574594 Free PMC article.
-
Preparing children for the operating room: psychological issues.Can J Anaesth. 1994 Nov;41(11):1094-103. doi: 10.1007/BF03015661. Can J Anaesth. 1994. PMID: 7828259 Review.
-
Effects of midazolam on explicit vs implicit memory in a pediatric surgery setting.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Nov;188(4):489-97. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0402-7. Epub 2006 Apr 22. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006. PMID: 16633798 Clinical Trial.
-
Premedication of children with oral midazolam.Can J Anaesth. 1992 Jul;39(6):545-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03008315. Can J Anaesth. 1992. PMID: 1643676 Clinical Trial.
-
A pilot study of the efficacy of oral midazolam for sedation in pediatric dental patients.Anesth Prog. 1996 Winter;43(1):1-8. Anesth Prog. 1996. PMID: 10323118 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources