Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 May-Jun;50(3):385-399.
doi: 10.1080/15374416.2019.1703711. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

A Population-Level, Randomized Effectiveness Trial of Recruitment Strategies for Parenting Programs in Elementary Schools

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A Population-Level, Randomized Effectiveness Trial of Recruitment Strategies for Parenting Programs in Elementary Schools

Michelle Abraczinskas et al. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2021 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: A population-level, randomized controlled trial was conducted to test the effectiveness of a parent recruitment package for increasing initial engagement into a school-based parenting program and to identify strategies responsible for effects.Method: Participants were caregivers of kindergarten- to third-grade students (N = 1,276) attending one of five schools serving ethnically diverse families living in mostly low-income, urban conditions. First, families were randomly assigned to be recruited for research surveys or not, and then to a parenting program recruitment condition: 1) Engagement-as-usual (EAU) informational flyer; 2) EAU + testimonial booklet; 3) EAU + teacher endorsement; 4) EAU + recruitment call; or 5) all strategies (full package). Caregivers were offered a free parenting program at their child's school. Primary dependent variables were parenting program enrollment and attending at least one session (initiation). Exploratory analyses were conducted on program completion, attendance across sessions, homework completion, and in-session participation.Results: In the population-level sample, enrollment and initiation were higher for the full package compared to all other conditions except the recruitment call condition. Enrollment, initiation, and program completion were higher for the recruitment call and full package conditions compared to the EAU condition. In the subsample of initiators, parents in the full package condition attended fewer parenting sessions than in the EAU condition. Controlling for attendance across sessions, there were no condition effects on homework completion or in-session participation.Conclusions: The recruitment call can increase the public health impact of evidence-based parenting programs by improving enrollment, initiation, and program completion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Participant Flowchart Note. Testimonial = testimonial booklet; Teacher = teacher endorsement; EC = engagement call.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and the Human Decision Process, 50, 179–211.
    1. Bamberger K, Coatsworth JD, Fosco G, & Ram N. (2014). Change in participant engagement during a family-based preventive intervention: Ups and downs with time and tension. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(6), 811–820. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Becker KD, Boustani MM, Gellatly R, & Chorpita BF. (2018). Forty years of engagement research in children’s mental health services: Multidimensional measurement and practice elements. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 47, 1–23. - PubMed
    1. Becker KD, Lee BR, Daleiden EL, Lindsey M, Brandt NE, & Chorpita BF. (2015). The common elements of engagement in children’s mental health services: Which elements for which outcomes?. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44, 30–43. - PubMed
    1. Begle AM, & Dumas JE. (2011). Child and parental outcomes following involvement in a preventive intervention: Efficacy of the PACE program. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 32, 67–81. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types