Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 7;15(1):e0227265.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227265. eCollection 2020.

Impact of viral disease hypophagia on pig jejunal function and integrity

Affiliations

Impact of viral disease hypophagia on pig jejunal function and integrity

Emma T Helm et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Pathogen challenges are often accompanied by reductions in feed intake, making it difficult to differentiate impacts of reduced feed intake from impacts of pathogen on various response parameters. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the impact of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus (PRRSV) and feed intake on parameters of jejunal function and integrity in growing pigs. Twenty-four pigs (11.34 ± 1.54 kg BW) were randomly selected and allotted to 1 of 3 treatments (n = 8 pigs/treatment): 1) PRRSV naïve, ad libitum fed (Ad), 2) PRRSV-inoculated, ad libitum fed (PRRS+), and 3) PRRSV naïve, pair-fed to the PRRS+ pigs' daily feed intake (PF). At 17 days post inoculation, all pigs were euthanized and the jejunum was collected for analysis. At days post inoculation 17, PRRS+ and PF pigs had decreased (P < 0.05) transepithelial resistance compared with Ad pigs; whereas fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran 4 kDa permeability was not different among treatments. Active glucose transport was increased (P < 0.05) in PRRS+ and PF pigs compared with Ad pigs. Brush border carbohydrase activity was reduced in PRRS+ pigs compared with PF pigs for lactase (55%; P = 0.015), sucrase (37%; P = 0.002), and maltase (30%; P = 0.015). For all three carbohydrases, Ad pigs had activities intermediate that of PRRS+ and PF pigs. The mRNA abundance of the tight junction proteins claudin 2, claudin 3, claudin 4, occludin, and zonula occludens-1 were reduced in PRRS+ pigs compared with Ad pigs; however, neither the total protein abundance nor the cellular compartmentalization of these tight junction proteins differed among treatments. Taken together, this study demonstrates that the changes that occur to intestinal epithelium structure, function, and integrity during a systemic PRRSV challenge can be partially explained by reductions in feed intake. Further, long term adaptation to PRRSV challenge and caloric restriction does reduce intestinal transepithelial resistance but does not appear to reduce the integrity of tight junction protein complexes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
A-C. Representative RNAscope duplex for Occludin (brown) and ZO-1 (red). A) Pigs were either PRRSV naïve and fed ad libitum (Ad); B) PRRSV naïve and pair-fed to PRRS+ pigs intake (PF); or C) challenged with PRRSV (PRRS+).
Fig 2
Fig 2
Representative immunohistochemistry images for Claudin 2 (A-C), Claudin 4 (D-F), and ZO-1 (G-I). Pigs were either PRRSV naïve and fed ad libitum (Ad: A, D, and G), PRRSV naïve and pair-fed to PRRS+ pigs intake (PF: B, E, and H), or challenged with PRRSV (PRRS+: C, F, and I). Pigs were euthanized at days post inoculation (dpi) 17. Staining was limited to the epithelial cells, with higher stain density at cell membranes.

References

    1. Adewole DI, Kim IH, Nyachoti CM. Gut Health of Pigs: Challenge Models and Response Criteria with a Critical Analysis of the Effectiveness of Selected Feed Additives—A Review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2016;29(7):909–24. 10.5713/ajas.15.0795 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shen L, Weber CR, Raleigh DR, Yu D, Turner JR. Tight junction pore and leak pathways: a dynamic duo. Annu Rev Physiol. 2011;73:283–309. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142150 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pearce SC, Mani V, Boddicker RL, Johnson JS, Weber TE, Ross JW, et al. Heat stress reduces intestinal barrier integrity and favors intestinal glucose transport in growing pigs. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e70215 10.1371/journal.pone.0070215 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pearce SC, Mani V, Weber TE, Rhoads RP, Patience JF, Baumgard LH, et al. Heat stress and reduced plane of nutrition decreases intestinal integrity and function in pigs. J Anim Sci. 2013;91(11):5183–93. 10.2527/jas.2013-6759 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moeser AJ, Pohl CS, Rajput M. Weaning stress and gastrointestinal barrier development: Implications for lifelong gut health in pigs. Anim Nutr. 2017;3(4):313–21. 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.06.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances