Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Feb:129:109892.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109892. Epub 2019 Dec 13.

Probability of major depression diagnostic classification based on the SCID, CIDI and MINI diagnostic interviews controlling for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression subscale scores: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 73 primary studies

Yin Wu  1 Brooke Levis  2 Ying Sun  3 Ankur Krishnan  3 Chen He  3 Kira E Riehm  4 Danielle B Rice  5 Marleine Azar  2 Xin Wei Yan  3 Dipika Neupane  2 Parash Mani Bhandari  2 Mahrukh Imran  3 Matthew J Chiovitti  3 Nazanin Saadat  3 Jill T Boruff  6 Pim Cuijpers  7 Simon Gilbody  8 Dean McMillan  8 John P A Ioannidis  9 Lorie A Kloda  10 Scott B Patten  11 Ian Shrier  12 Roy C Ziegelstein  13 Melissa Henry  3 Zahinoor Ismail  14 Carmen G Loiselle  15 Nicholas D Mitchell  16 Marcello Tonelli  17 Samir Al-Adawi  18 Anna Beraldi  19 Anna P B M Braeken  20 Natalie Büel-Drabe  21 Adomas Bunevicius  22 Gregory Carter  23 Chih-Ken Chen  24 Gary Cheung  25 Kerrie Clover  26 Ronán M Conroy  27 Daniel Cukor  28 Carlos E da Rocha E Silva  29 Eli Dabscheck  30 Federico M Daray  31 Elles Douven  32 Marina G Downing  33 Anthony Feinstein  34 Panagiotis P Ferentinos  35 Felix H Fischer  36 Alastair J Flint  37 Maiko Fujimori  38 Pamela Gallagher  39 Milena Gandy  40 Simone Goebel  41 Luigi Grassi  42 Martin Härter  43 Josef Jenewein  44 Nathalie Jetté  45 Miguel Julião  46 Jae-Min Kim  47 Sung-Wan Kim  48 Marie Kjærgaard  49 Sebastian Köhler  50 Wim L Loosman  51 Bernd Löwe  52 Rocio Martin-Santos  53 Loreto Massardo  54 Yutaka Matsuoka  55 Anja Mehnert  56 Ioannis Michopoulos  57 Laurent Misery  58 Ricard Navines  53 Meaghan L O'Donnell  59 Ahmet Öztürk  60 Jurate Peceliuniene  61 Luis Pintor  62 Jennie L Ponsford  33 Terence J Quinn  63 Silje E Reme  64 Katrin Reuter  65 Alasdair G Rooney  66 Roberto Sánchez-González  67 Marcelo L Schwarzbold  68 Vesile Senturk Cankorur  69 Juwita Shaaban  70 Louise Sharpe  71 Michael Sharpe  72 Sébastien Simard  73 Susanne Singer  74 Lesley Stafford  75 Jon Stone  76 Serge Sultan  77 Antonio L Teixeira  78 Istvan Tiringer  79 Alyna Turner  80 Jane Walker  72 Mark Walterfang  81 Liang-Jen Wang  82 Jennifer White  83 Dana K Wong  84 Andrea Benedetti  85 Brett D Thombs  86
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Probability of major depression diagnostic classification based on the SCID, CIDI and MINI diagnostic interviews controlling for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression subscale scores: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 73 primary studies

Yin Wu et al. J Psychosom Res. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Two previous individual participant data meta-analyses (IPDMAs) found that different diagnostic interviews classify different proportions of people as having major depression overall or by symptom levels. We compared the odds of major depression classification across diagnostic interviews among studies that administered the Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D).

Methods: Data accrued for an IPDMA on HADS-D diagnostic accuracy were analysed. We fit binomial generalized linear mixed models to compare odds of major depression classification for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), controlling for HADS-D scores and participant characteristics with and without an interaction term between interview and HADS-D scores.

Results: There were 15,856 participants (1942 [12%] with major depression) from 73 studies, including 15,335 (97%) non-psychiatric medical patients, 164 (1%) partners of medical patients, and 357 (2%) healthy adults. The MINI (27 studies, 7345 participants, 1066 major depression cases) classified participants as having major depression more often than the CIDI (10 studies, 3023 participants, 269 cases) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.70 (0.84, 3.43)) and the semi-structured SCID (36 studies, 5488 participants, 607 cases) (aOR = 1.52 (1.01, 2.30)). The odds ratio for major depression classification with the CIDI was less likely to increase as HADS-D scores increased than for the SCID (interaction aOR = 0.92 (0.88, 0.96)).

Conclusion: Compared to the SCID, the MINI may diagnose more participants as having major depression, and the CIDI may be less responsive to symptom severity.

Keywords: Depressive disorders; Diagnostic interviews; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Individual participant data meta-analysis; Major depression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources