Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 6;10(1):e028766.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028766.

Importance of quality in breast cancer screening practice - a natural experiment in Alberta, Canada

Affiliations

Importance of quality in breast cancer screening practice - a natural experiment in Alberta, Canada

Yan Yuan et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Regular breast cancer screening is a widely used cancer prevention strategy. Important quality indicators of screening include cancer detection rate, false positive rate, benign biopsy rate and post-screen invasive cancer rate. We compared quality indicators of community radiology clinics to those of 'Screen Test', which feature centralised batch reading and quality control processes. Both types of providers operated under a single provincial Breast Cancer Screening Programme.

Setting: Community radiology clinics are operated by independent fee-for-service radiologists serving large and small communities throughout the Canadian province of Alberta. Launched by the provincial cancer agency, the Screen Test operates two physical clinics serving metropolises and mobile units serving remote regions. Eligible women may self-refer to any provider for screening mammography.

Participants: Women aged 50 to 69 years who had at least one screening mammogram between July 2006 and June 2010 in Alberta were included. Women with missing health region information or prior breast cancer diagnosis were excluded.

Results: A total of 389 788 screening mammograms were analysed, of which 12.7% were performed by Screen Test. Compared with Screen Test during 2006 to 2008, community radiology clinics had a lower cancer detection rate (3.6 vs 4.6 per 1000 screens, risk ratio (RR): 0.81, 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.98) and a much higher false positive rate (9.4% vs 3.4%, RR: 2.72, 95% CI: 2.55 to 2.90). Most other performance indicators were also better in Screen Test overall and across all health regions. These performance indicators were similar during 2008 to 2010, showing no improvement with time.

Conclusions: Screen Test has a quality assurance process in place and performed significantly better. This provides empirical evidence of the effectiveness of a quality assurance process and may explain some of the large differences in breast cancer screening indicators between provinces and countries with formal programmes and those without.

Keywords: oncology; public health; quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Tabar L, Gad A, Holmberg L, et al. . Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography: randomised trial from the breast cancer screening Working group of the Swedish national board of health and welfare. The Lancet 1985;325:829–32. - PubMed
    1. Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ, et al. . Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National breast screening study: randomised screening trial. BMJ 2014;348:g366 10.1136/bmj.g366 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40-74 years. Can Med Assoc J 2011;183:1991–2001. 10.1503/cmaj.110334 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ringash J. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer. CMAJ 2001;164:469–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for breast cancer: U.S. preventive services Task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:716–26. 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00008 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms