Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Apr;76(4):501-506.
doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02806-x. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

Sufentanil versus fentanyl for pain relief in labor involving combined spinal-epidural analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Sufentanil versus fentanyl for pain relief in labor involving combined spinal-epidural analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Mengjia Zhi et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically compare the efficacy and safety of sufentanil versus fentanyl for pain relief in labor involving combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSEA), a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials targeting parturients requesting labor analgesia was conducted.

Methods: The primary outcome measure was visual analog scale scores assessed at 10, 15, 30, and 60 min after intrathecal injection. Secondary outcomes included duration of spinal analgesia, incidence of side effects in parturients, and neonatal Apgar scores.

Results: Twelve randomized controlled trials, including data from 881 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. No clinically meaningful differences in pain reduction after intrathecal injection were found between the two analgesics. Sufentanil extended the duration of spinal analgesia by 25.40 min (95% CI 21.82 to 28.98 min; p < 0.00001) compared with fentanyl. The risk for pruritus, nausea, and vomiting among parturients was 82% for those using sufentanil (relative risk 0.82 [95% CI 0.67-0.99]; p = 0.04) and 48% for those using fentanyl (relative risk 0.48 [95% CI 0.29-0.80]; p = 0.005). Both the synthesis results and sensitivity analysis demonstrated no differences in the risk for respiratory depression between parturients using sufentanil versus fentanyl. The neonates in sufentanil group exhibited higher Apgar scores than the fentanyl group 5 min after delivery (weighted mean difference 0.10 [95% CI 0.05-0.16]; p = 0.0002).

Conclusion: Existing evidence suggests that compared with fentanyl, sufentanil used for analgesia in combined spinal-epidural during labor is more effective in extending the duration of spinal analgesia, and may be safer for the infant. There was overall low clinical and statistical heterogeneity among the included studies. For all outcomes, variations caused by heterogeneity across trials were acceptable. Thus the findings of this meta-analysis may provide additional evidence for future clinical practices of pain relief in labor involving CSEA. Stronger evidence supporting this conclusion will require data from more high-quality and multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Keywords: Combined spinal-epidural analgesia; Fentanyl; Labor; Sufentanil; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;129(4):e73-e89 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Anesth. 1998 Sep;10(6):488-93 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647 - PubMed
    1. Can J Anaesth. 2001 Jun;48(6):570-4 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources