Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Jan;23(1):e25426.
doi: 10.1002/jia2.25426.

Emerging evidence from a systematic review of safety of pre-exposure prophylaxis for pregnant and postpartum women: where are we now and where are we heading?

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Emerging evidence from a systematic review of safety of pre-exposure prophylaxis for pregnant and postpartum women: where are we now and where are we heading?

Dvora L Joseph Davey et al. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: HIV incidence is high during pregnancy and breastfeeding with HIV acquisition risk more than doubling during pregnancy and the postpartum period compared to when women are not pregnant. The World Health Organization recommends offering pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to pregnant and postpartum women at substantial risk of HIV infection. However, maternal PrEP national guidelines differ and most countries with high maternal HIV incidence are not offering PrEP. We conducted a systematic review of recent research on PrEP safety in pregnancy to inform national policy and rollout.

Methods: We used a standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) approach to conduct a systematic review by searching for completed, ongoing, or planned PrEP in pregnancy projects or studies from clinicaltrials.gov, PubMed and NIH RePORTER from 2014 to March 2019. We performed a systematic review of studies that assess tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based oral PrEP safety in pregnant and breastfeeding HIV-uninfected women.

Results and discussion: We identified 14 completed (n = 5) and ongoing/planned (n = 9) studies that evaluate maternal and/or infant outcomes following PrEP exposure during pregnancy or breastfeeding. None of the completed studies found differences in pregnancy or perinatal outcomes associated with PrEP exposure. Nine ongoing studies, to be completed by 2022, will provide data on >6200 additional PrEP-exposed pregnancies and assess perinatal, infant growth and bone health outcomes, expanding by sixfold the data on PrEP safety in pregnancy. Research gaps include limited data on (1) accurately measured PrEP exposure within maternal and infant populations including drug levels needed for maternal protection; (2) uncommon perinatal outcomes (e.g. congenital anomalies); (3) infant outcomes such as bone growth beyond one year following PrEP exposure; (4) outcomes in HIV-uninfected women who use PrEP during pregnancy and/or lactation.

Conclusions: Expanding delivery of PrEP is an essential strategy to reduce HIV incidence in pregnancy and breastfeeding women. Early safety studies of PrEP among pregnant women without HIV infection are reassuring and ongoing/planned studies will contribute extensive new data to bolster the safety profile of PrEP use in pregnancy. However, addressing research gaps is essential to expanding PrEP delivery for women in the context of pregnancy.

Keywords: HIV; PMTCT; PrEP; breastfeeding; preexposure prophylaxis; pregnancy; prevention of mother to child transmission.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart of identified studies and projects on maternal and infant outcomes following oral PrEP exposure during pregnancy and breastfeeding (10 to 30 March 2019).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Timing of teratogenic exposures during pregnancy and adverse potential outcomes 64. (b) Time and duration of pre/postnatal PrEP exposure in completed (light grey) and ongoing/planned studies (dark grey).

References

    1. Drake AL, Wagner A, Richardson B, John‐Stewart G. Incident HIV during pregnancy and postpartum and risk of mother‐to‐child HIV transmission: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. PLoS Med. 2014;11:e1001608. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomson KA, Hughes J, Baeten JM, John‐Stewart G, Celum C, Cohen CR, et al. Increased risk of female HIV‐1 acquisition throughout pregnancy and postpartum: a prospective per‐coital act analysis among women with HIV‐1 infected partners. J Infect Dis. 2018;218(1):16–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson LF, Stinson K, Newell ML, Bland RM, Moultrie H, Davies MA, et al. The contribution of maternal HIV seroconversion during late pregnancy and breastfeeding to mother‐to‐child transmission of HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;59(4):417–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dinh TH, Delaney KP, Goga A, Jackson D, Lombard C, Woldesenbet S, et al. Impact of maternal HIV seroconversion during pregnancy on early mother to child transmission of HIV (MTCT) measured at 4–8 weeks postpartum in South Africa 2011–2012: a national population‐based evaluation. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0125525. - PMC - PubMed
    1. UNAIDS . Start Free Stay Free AIDS Free. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS; 2019.

Publication types

MeSH terms