Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr;33(2):185-191.
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000832.

Decision aids in anesthesia: do they help?

Warren A Southerland  1 , Leah J Beight  2 , Fred E Shapiro  1 , Richard D Urman  3
Affiliations
Review

Decision aids in anesthesia: do they help?

Warren A Southerland et al. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Patient decision aids are educational tools used to assist patients and clinicians in healthcare decisions. As healthcare moves toward patient-centered care, these tools can provide support to anesthesiologists by facilitating shared decision-making.

Recent findings: Recent research has shown that patient decision aids are beneficial in the clinical setting for patients and physicians. Studies have shown that patients feel better informed, have better knowledge, and have less anxiety, depression, and decisional conflict after using patient decision aids. In addition, a structured approach for the development of patient decision aids in the field of anesthesia has been established.

Summary: Patient decision aids can support patient-centered care delivery and shared decision-making, especially in the field of anesthesia. Current research involves implementing the use of patient decision aids in the discussion for monitored anesthesia care. Further development of quality metrics is needed to improve the decision aids and maximize decision quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2000.
    1. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century 2001; 364:0–309.
    1. Korteland NM, Ahmed Y, Koolbergen DR, et al. Does the use of a decision aid improve decision making in prosthetic heart valve selection? A multicenter randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2017; 10: doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003178. - DOI
    1. Gorawara-Bhat R, O’Muircheartaigh S, Mohile S, Dale W. Patients’ perceptions and attitudes on recurrent prostate cancer and hormone therapy: qualitative comparison between decision-aid and control groups. J Geriatr Oncol 2017; 8:368–373.
    1. Miles A, Chronakis I, Fox J, Mayer A. Use of a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e012935doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012935. - DOI