Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Jun;25(3):147-154.
doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000433.

Use of feedback on medium-term blood pressure measurement skills in medical students: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Use of feedback on medium-term blood pressure measurement skills in medical students: a randomized controlled trial

Margareth Alves Bastos E Castro et al. Blood Press Monit. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of feedback on medium-term blood pressure (BP) measurement skills in medical students versus a control group.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial in first-year medical students was conducted. After theoretical-practical training on measuring BP, the students were randomized into a control group or intervention group. The skill was assessed immediately after the training (T1) by evaluating students with a simulated standardized patient using a checklist. Students in the intervention group received feedback immediately after assessment, whereas the control group received no feedback. After 3 months (T2), each student was reassessed in the same way as for (T1).

Results: Ninety-two first-year medical students took part in the study (45 in control group and 47 in intervention group). At T1, there were no differences in the skill measured. At T2 (after three months), there was a significant difference in the intervention group (score = 23.97 ± 3.82) compared with the control group (score = 20.91 ± 4.87), P < 0.001, d = 0.69. In the intervention group, the scores were maintained at 3 months (T1 = 23.23 and T2 = 23.97, P = 0.335), whereas in the control group, scores declined significantly (T1 = 23.44 and T2 = 20.91; P = 0.002).

Conclusion: Receiving feedback promotes retention of learning of BP measurement skills over the medium term. Further studies applying feedback to other skills should be conducted.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kluger AN, DeNisi A.. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull. 1996; 119:254–284
    1. Hattie J, Timperley H.. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007; 77:81–112
    1. Ende J.. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983; 250:777–781
    1. Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB.. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians’ clinical performance: BEME guide no. 7. Med Teach. 2006; 28:117–128
    1. van de Ridder JM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate OT.. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ. 2008; 42:189–197

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources