Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;33(3):120-122.
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000932.

Propensity Score Matching: A Statistical Method

Affiliations

Propensity Score Matching: A Statistical Method

Liam T Kane et al. Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Propensity score matching (PSM) is a commonly used statistical method in orthopedic surgery research that accomplishes the removal of confounding bias from observational cohorts where the benefit of randomization is not possible. An alternative to multiple regression analysis, PSM attempts to reduce the effects of confounders by matching already treated subjects with control subjects who exhibit a similar propensity for treatment based on preexisting covariates that influence treatment selection. It, therefore, establishes a new control group by discarding outlier control subjects. This new control group reduces the unwanted influences of covariates, allowing for proper measurement of the intended variable. An example from orthopedic spine literature is discussed to illustrate how PSM may be applied in practice. PSM is uniquely valuable in its utility and simplicity, but it is limited in that it requires the removal of data and works primarily on binary treatments. In addition to matching, the propensity score can be used for stratification, covariate adjustments, and inverse probability of treatment weighting, but these topics are outside the scope of this paper. Personnel in the orthopedic field would benefit from learning about the function and application of this method given its common use in the orthopedic literature.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bovonratwet P, Nelson SJ, Ondeck NT, et al. Comparison of 30-day complications between navigated and conventional single-level instrumented posterior lumbar fusion: a propensity score matched analysis. Spine. 2018;43:447–453.
    1. Bovonratwet P, Fu MC, Tyagi V, et al. Safety of outpatient single-level cervical total disc replacement: a propensity-matched multi-institutional study. Spine. 2018;44:E530–E538.
    1. Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, et al. Thirty-day morbidity after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: identification of risk factors and emphasis on the safety of outpatient procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:1288–1294.
    1. Cole T, Veeravagu A, Zhang M, et al. Anterior versus posterior approach for multilevel degenerative cervical disease: a retrospective propensity score-matched study of the MarketScan Database. Spine. 2015;40:1033–1038.
    1. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.

LinkOut - more resources