How the Reputation of Orthopaedic Residency Programs Is Associated with Orthopaedic Fellowship Match Results
- PMID: 31913867
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00750
How the Reputation of Orthopaedic Residency Programs Is Associated with Orthopaedic Fellowship Match Results
Abstract
Background: The primary goal of the present study was to determine if applicants from higher-ranking U.S. orthopaedic surgery residency programs match at a more desired position on their fellowship match-rank list compared with those applicants from lower-ranked residency programs.
Methods: San Francisco Match provided results regarding applicant data and match results from 2014 to 2018 for all orthopaedic subspecialties except the hand and the shoulder and elbow. Unmatched applicants and international medical graduates were excluded. Residency programs were divided into 5 tiers (with tier 1 being the highest-ranked residency programs and tier 5 being the lowest-ranked programs) on the basis of 2018 Doximity rankings of orthopaedic residency programs. Statistical analysis consisted of descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and analysis of variance.
Results: Two thousand eight hundred and eleven applicants met inclusion criteria. Applicants from residency programs in tiers 1 and 2 applied to significantly fewer programs than those from tiers 3, 4, or 5 (p < 0.0001). Applicants from each tier were significantly more likely to attain interviews than applicants from all tiers below them (p < 0.01). Applicants from tier-1 residency programs matched at a significantly higher position on their rank list (p < 0.001) and were more desirably ranked by fellowship programs (p = 0.003) compared with all other tiers.
Conclusions: Applicants from the highest-ranking residency programs apply to fewer programs, interview at a greater percentage of these programs, and are more likely to match to 1 of their top-ranking programs than applicants from lower-ranking programs. However, the association of the applicant match position with the program ranking appears to be most pronounced when it comes to fellowships selecting which applicants to interview. These findings may help future applicants when determining which programs to apply to during the match.
References
-
- Kavolus JJ, Matson AP, Byrd WA, Brigman BE. Factors influencing orthopedic surgery residents’ choice of subspecialty fellowship. Orthopedics. 2017 Sep 1;40(5):e820-1-7. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
-
- Niesen MC, Wong J, Ebramzadeh E, Sangiorgio S, SooHoo NF, Luck JV, Eckardt J. Orthopedic surgery fellowships: the effects of interviewing and how residents establish a rank list. Orthopedics. 2015 Mar;38(3):175-1-7.
-
- DePasse JM, Daniels AH, Durand W, Kingery B, Prodromo J, Mulcahey MK. Completion of multiple fellowships by orthopedic surgeons: analysis of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery certification database. Orthopedics. 2018 Jan 1;41(1):e33-1-7.
-
- Healy WL, Bedair H. Videoconference interviews for an adult reconstruction fellowship: lessons learned. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Nov 1;99(21):e114.
-
- Gaskill T, Cook C, Nunley J, Mather RC. The financial impact of orthopaedic fellowship training. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(7):1814-1-7.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
