Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 24:2019:3634202.
doi: 10.1155/2019/3634202. eCollection 2019.

Dimensional Variations of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes

Niels Hegland  1 , Sebastian Schnitzler  1 , Jan Ellensohn  1 , Marc P Steurer  2 , Markus Weiss  3 , Alexander Dullenkopf  1
Affiliations

Dimensional Variations of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes

Niels Hegland et al. Anesthesiol Res Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Tube size selection is critical in ventilating patients' lungs using double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs). Little information about relevant parameters is readily available from manufacturers. The aim of this study is to provide reference data for relevant dimensions of conventionally available DLTs.

Methods: In this study in a benchmark in vitro setup, several dimensional parameters of four sizes of left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tubes from six different manufacturers were assessed, such as distances and diameters of tube shaft, cuff lengths, and diameters as well the angle at the tip.

Results: Endobronchial tubes of ostensibly the same size revealed wide variation in measured parameters between brands from different manufacturers. In some parameters, there was an overlap between different sizes from the same manufacturer, i.e., diameters and distances did not increase with increasing nominal endobronchial tube size. The information about dimensions of endobronchial tubes provided by manufacturers' leaflets is insufficient.

Conclusions: Endobronchial tube size selection carries unnecessary uncertainty because clinically relevant parameters are unknown and vary considerably between different manufacturers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MW is a medical consultant for Medicoplast GmbH (Illingen, Germany).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of localization of measured parameters. A = beginning of the DLT shaft. B = midpoint between the beginning of the shaft of the tube (A) and the proximal edge of the tracheal cuff (C). C = proximal edge of the tracheal cuff. D = distal edge of the tracheal cuff. E = proximal edge of the bronchial cuff. F = distal edge of the bronchial cuff. H = virtual extrapolated longitudinal line through the middle of the tracheal tube shaft. I = virtual extrapolated longitudinal line through bronchial tube shaft.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Meggiolaro K. M., Wulf H., Feldmann C., Wiesmann T., Schubert A.-K., Risse J. Airway management for lung separation in thoracic surgery: an update. Der Anaesthesist. 2018;67(8):555–567. doi: 10.1007/s00101-018-0470-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pedoto A. How to choose the double-lumen tube size and side: the eternal debate. Anesthesiology Clinics. 2012;30(4):671–681. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2012.08.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mourisse J., Liesveld J., Verhagen A., et al. Efficiency, efficacy, and safety of EZ-blocker compared with left-sided double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(3):550–561. doi: 10.1097/aln.0b013e3182834f2d. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dumans-Nizard V., Liu N., Laloë P.-A., Fischler M. A comparison of the deflecting-tip bronchial blocker with a wire-guided blocker or left-sided double-lumen tube. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2009;23(4):501–505. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.02.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Defosse J., Schieren M., Böhmer A., et al. A Germany-wide survey on anaesthesia in thoracic surgery. Der Anaesthesist. 2016;65(6):449–457. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0175-2. - DOI - PubMed